The two pie charts illustrate the proportion of graduate income after graduating one year in 1987 and 2007.
Overall, the rate of graduates who were paid higher than national average was highest whilst the figure for jobless made up the least of the total in both two years.
Looking into more details, the proportion of graduates without work accounted for 11%; however, this figure dipped notably to 3% in 2007. Furthermore, a considerable decline was seen at the number of graduates who got paid twice as much as the national average, from 18% in 1987 to 5% in 2007.
On the other hand, the rate of graduates with earnings less than the national average was roughly doubled from a quarter to more than two-fifths after two decades. Moreover, graduates with higher revenue than the national average occupied 46% in 1987, then there was a slight growth to 47% in 2007.
The two pie charts illustrate the proportion of
graduate
income after graduating one year in 1987 and 2007.
Overall
, the rate of
graduates
who
were paid
higher than
national
average
was highest whilst the figure for jobless made up the least of the total in both two years.
Looking into more
details
, the proportion of
graduates
without work accounted for 11%;
however
, this figure dipped
notably
to 3% in 2007.
Furthermore
, a considerable decline was
seen
at the number of
graduates
who
got
paid twice as much as the
national
average
, from 18% in 1987 to 5% in 2007.
On the other hand
, the rate of
graduates
with earnings less than the
national
average
was roughly doubled from a quarter to more than two-fifths after two decades.
Moreover
,
graduates
with higher revenue than the
national
average
occupied 46% in 1987, then there was a slight growth to 47% in 2007.