Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. WJLD
The bar chart has illuminated apparently the ratios’ modifications in the typical house fees in five disparate cities - namely New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London- which changes were divided into two periods, 1990 to 1995 along with 1996 to 2002, in comparison with the late 1980s. The key point this chart signifies is that there were two contrary tendencies in over a decade. In the first five years since 1990, rates majorly slumped to considerable numbers whilst the remainder of the duration (1996-2002) expanded markedly. A glance at the figure in the early 1990s, it can be observed that Tokyo and London made sharp falls when deteriorating significantly by over 5% respectively for both cities. Additionally, New York had made noticeable cutbacks in the costs of average housing. Despite the dominant reductions, Frankfurt in accompany with Madrid strengthened equally by slight amounts which constituted approximately 1-2%. Having a detailed account into the aforementioned data, in the late 1990s, Japanese city stood out with the substantial growth by roughly a tenth compared with the previous decade. American urban area as well as Spanish metropolitan enlarged to be generally exorbitant increasing around 5%. There was a remarkable disparity between London and the others when English capital continuously remained stable the downward trend in spite of improving minimally by precisely 2% after 5 years in the second period.
The bar chart has illuminated
apparently
the ratios’ modifications in the typical
house
fees in five disparate cities
-
namely
New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London- which
changes
were divided
into two periods, 1990 to 1995 along with 1996 to 2002,
in comparison
with the late 1980s.

The key point this chart signifies is that there were two contrary tendencies in over a decade. In the
first
five years since 1990, rates
majorly
slumped to considerable numbers whilst the remainder of the duration (1996-2002) expanded
markedly
.

A glance at the figure in the early 1990s, it can
be observed
that Tokyo and London made sharp falls when deteriorating
significantly
by over 5%
respectively
for both cities.
Additionally
, New York had made noticeable cutbacks in the costs of average housing. Despite the dominant reductions, Frankfurt in
accompany with
Madrid strengthened
equally
by slight amounts which constituted approximately 1-2%.

Having a detailed account into the aforementioned data, in the late 1990s, Japanese city stood out with the substantial growth by roughly a tenth compared with the previous decade. American urban area
as well
as Spanish metropolitan enlarged to be
generally
exorbitant increasing around 5%. There was a remarkable disparity between London and the others when English capital
continuously
remained stable the downward trend
in spite of
improving
minimally
by
precisely
2% after 5 years in the second period.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
227 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts