Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart provides information about the percentage of British people generosity of various age group donating money to charity for the years 1990 and 2010. Overall, in both of the year charity by different age group experienced an upward trend with some fluctuations. Although, in 1990 initially had higher percentage rate, it advanced at the end by the year 2010 following some fluctuations The charity fund by the age group 18-25 was about 16% in 1990, being higher than 2010 by approximately 10%. Afterward it rose to almost 31% to age group 26-35 and reached highest for the age group 36-50. However, the figure showed a gradual decreased to 35% for the year 51-65 and continued to decline reaching around 27%, which is the pecuniary accorded by the age group greater than 65 years. Percentage of charity by the age group 18-25 was slightly greater than 5% in 2010, and it increased to slightly less than 25% for the age group of 26-35 and continued to follow the same trend for the age group 36-50 and 51-65 acquiring the charity fund of 35% and about 39% respectively. However, for the age group greater than 65 years it is observed to decrease 4% than the previous once.
The bar chart provides information about the percentage of British
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
generosity of various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
donating money to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charity
for the years 1990 and 2010.

Overall
, in both of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charity
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
experienced an upward trend with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
fluctuations. Although, in 1990
initially
had higher percentage rate, it advanced at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2010 following
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
fluctuations

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charity
fund by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
18-25 was about 16% in 1990, being higher than 2010 by approximately 10%. Afterward it rose to almost 31% to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
26-35 and reached highest for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
36-50.
However
, the figure
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a gradual decreased to 35% for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
51-65 and continued to decline reaching around 27%, which is the pecuniary accorded by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
greater than 65 years.

Percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charity
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
18-25 was
slightly
greater than 5% in 2010, and it increased to
slightly
less than 25% for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
of 26-35 and continued to follow the same trend for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
36-50 and 51-65 acquiring the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charity
fund of 35% and about 39%
respectively
.
However
, for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
group
greater than 65 years it
is observed
to decrease 4% than the previous once.

IELTS academic The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
207 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant