Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on roads and transport by the government in four countries,

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on roads and transport by the government in four countries, mXJOA
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on roads and transport by the government in four countries, namely Italia, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that the government in Portugal spent the highest proportion on roads and transports in the given period. It’s clear that the figure for the UK is the lowest. Looking at the details, in Portugal spending stood at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased considerably to the lowest point of 20% in 2005. Conversely, the percentage of expenditure in the USA started at nearly 11% in the first year, followed by a dramatically upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995. As regards, government expenditure in Italia and the UK stood respectively at about 22% and 10% in 1990, before a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995. Similarly, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two countries in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final year. The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on roads and transport by the government in four countries, namely Italia, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that the government in Portugal spent the highest proportion on roads and transports in the given period. It’s clear that the figure for the UK is the lowest. Looking at the details, in Portugal spending stood at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased considerably to the lowest point of 20% in 2005. Conversely, the percentage of expenditure in the USA started at nearly 11% in the first year, followed by a dramatically upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995. As regards, government expenditure in Italia and the UK stood respectively at about 22% and 10% in 1990, before a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995. Similarly, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two countries in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final year. in four countries, namely Italia, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that the government in Portugal spent the highest proportion on roads and transports in the given period. It’s clear that the figure for the UK is the lowest. Looking at the details, in Portugal spending stood at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased considerably to the lowest point of 20% in 2005. Conversely, the percentage of expenditure in the USA started at nearly 11% in the first year, followed by a dramatically upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995. As regards, government expenditure in Italia and the UK stood respectively at about 22% and 10% in 1990, before a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995. Similarly, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two countries in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final year.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
in four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
,
namely
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
in Portugal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
the highest proportion on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period. It’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the figure for the UK is the lowest.

Looking at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, in Portugal spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased
considerably
to the lowest point of 20% in 2005.
Conversely
, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in the USA
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
at
nearly
11% in the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, followed by a
dramatically
upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995.

As regards,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
and the UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
respectively
at about 22% and 10% in 1990,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995.
Similarly
, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final year.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of money
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
in four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
,
namely
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
in Portugal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
the highest proportion on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period. It’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the figure for the UK is the lowest.

Looking at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, in Portugal spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased
considerably
to the lowest point of 20% in 2005.
Conversely
, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in the USA
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
at
nearly
11% in the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, followed by a
dramatically
upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995.

As regards,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
and the UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
respectively
at about 22% and 10% in 1990,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995.
Similarly
, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final year.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
in
four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
,
namely
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
, Portugal, the UK, and the USA at five-year intervals between 1990 and 2005.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
in Portugal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spent
the highest proportion on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
period. It’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the figure for the UK is the lowest.

Looking at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, in Portugal spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
at about 28% in 1990 after which it decreased
considerably
to the lowest point of 20% in 2005.
Conversely
, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in the USA
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
at
nearly
11% in the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, followed by a
dramatically
upward trend to 15% in 2005, despite an approximate 1% drop in 1995.

As regards,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
Italia
and the UK
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
stood
respectively
at about 22% and 10% in 1990,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
a slight respective decrease to 2% and 1% in 1995.
Similarly
, there was an approximate 4% growth in all two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in 2000, and it then declined by 5% in the final
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on roads and transport by the government in four countries,

Academic
  American English
12 paragraphs
518 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts