recycled house hold waste
recycled house hold waste mL07N
The given chart represents percentages of four different types of recycled household waste in a city during 1992, 1997 and 2002.
Overall, recycled waste kept rising in 10 years. In contrast, there was a collapse of cans between 1992 and 1997.
In 1992, the percentages of recycled plastic, cans, paper and glass were below 20%. Thereinto, paper and glass were around 14% for recycling. The rate of cans was slightly higher (15%). Recycled plastics had the lowest percentage, approximately 10%.
In 1997, there was a steadily ascending plastics (13%) and paper (19%). In five years, the increase of recycled glass rapidly reaching to 29%. Contrarily, only cans fell to 12%. Except plastic stayed constant at 13%, the remains all in an upward trend in 2002. Cans got to 20%; Paper almost achieved with 30%; Around 49% glass boomed.
In conclusion, the bar chart illustrates the requirements of four types of recycled constantly growing every five years.
The
given
chart represents percentages of four
different
types of
recycled
household waste in a city during 1992, 1997 and 2002.
Overall
,
recycled
waste
kept
rising in 10 years.
In contrast
, there was a collapse of
cans
between 1992 and 1997.
In 1992, the percentages of
recycled
plastic
,
cans
, paper and
glass
were below 20%.
Thereinto
, paper and
glass
were around 14% for recycling. The rate of
cans
was
slightly
higher (15%).
Recycled
plastics
had the lowest percentage, approximately 10%.
In 1997, there was a
steadily
ascending
plastics
(13%) and paper (19%). In five years, the increase of
recycled
glass
rapidly
reaching to 29%.
Contrarily
,
only
cans
fell to 12%. Except
plastic
stayed constant at 13%, the remains all in an upward trend in 2002.
Cans
got
to 20%; Paper almost achieved with 30%; Around 49%
glass
boomed.
In conclusion
, the bar chart illustrates the requirements of four types of
recycled
constantly
growing every five years.