Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Germany electricity generation, 2009 (560billion KWh) and France electricity generation 2009 ( 510 bilion KWh)

Germany electricity generation, 2009 (560billion KWh) and France electricity generation 2009 ( 510 bilion KWh) E33KR

The four charts compare the electricity generated between German and France in 2009, and it is measured in billions KWh. Overall, it can be seen that conventional thermal was the main source of electricity in Germany, whereas nuclear was the main source in France. The bulk of electricity in Germany whose total output was 560 billion KWh, came from conventional thermal, at 56. 9%. In France, the total output was lower 510 billion KWh, and in contrast to Germany, conventional thermal accounted for just 10. 3%, with most electricity coming from nuclear power 76. %. In Germany, the proportion of nuclear power generated electricity was only one fifth of the total. Moving on to renewables, this accounted for quite similar proportions for both Countries ranging from around 14% to 17% of the total electricity generated. In detail, in Germany, most of the renewables consisted of wind and biomass, totalling around 75% which was higher than hydroelectric 17. 7% and solar 6. 1%. The situation was very different in France, where hydroelectric made up 80. 5% of renewable electricity with biomass, wind and solar making up the remaining 20%. Neither country used geothermal energy.

The four charts compare the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 generated between German and France in 2009, and it is measured
 in billions Possible spelling mistake found.kWhKWHKphBWHDWHKMH
KWh
.

Overall
, it can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 that conventional thermal was the main source of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 in Germany, whereas nuclear was the main source in France.

The bulk of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 in Germany whose total output was 560 billion Possible spelling mistake found.kWhKWHKphBWHDWHKMH
KWh
, came from conventional thermal, at 56. 9%. In France, the total output was lower 510 billion Possible spelling mistake found.kWhKWHKphBWHDWHKMH
KWh
, and in contrast
 to Germany, conventional thermal accounted for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 10. 3%, with most You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 coming from nuclear power 76. %. In Germany, the proportion of nuclear power generated You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 one fifth of the total.

Moving on to renewables, this accounted for quite similar proportions for both Countries ranging from around 14% to 17% of the total You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 generated. In detail, in Germany, most of the renewables consisted of wind and biomass, Possible spelling mistake. 'totalling' is British English.totaling
totalling
 around 75% which was higher than hydroelectric 17. 7% and solar 6. 1%. The situation was This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 in France, where hydroelectric made up 80. 5% of renewable You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheatservice
electricity
 with biomass, wind and solar making up the remaining 20%. Neither country This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 geothermal energy. 