Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

finances for a local authority in New Zealand

finances for a local authority in New Zealand yNMKd
The line chart illustrates a local authority in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022, in terms of Rates revenues, User changes, Borrowings and Grants & subsidies. It is clear that Rates revenues had the highest point in four criteria. It is also noticeable that the figures for Rates revenues and User changes rises, while the data for Borrowing and Grants & subsidies various through the period shown. In 2012, the finance from Rates revenues was highest, at around 1490 million, followed by the figures for Users changes, Borrowings and Grants & subsidies, at nearly 1000, 850, 490 million respectively. Four years later, Rates revenues and Users changes witnessted gradual rises, to roughly 1600 and 1500 million, whilst the Borrowings saw an abrupt dip, standing at 600 million. Meanwhile, the finance from Grants and subsidies increased significantly, after experiencing a slight rise, at around 700 million. In 2020, Rates revenues seemed to continue to increase gradually, with its data reaching approximately 2100 million. In 2022, the finances from Rates revenue witness dramatic rise, at roughly 2400 million. At the same time, the figure for Borrowings is predicted to remained unchanged, standing at around 800 million, whereas the finance from Grants and subsidies is expected to drop gently. In contrast, that of Users changes is forecasted to increasing to about 2100 million.
The line chart illustrates a local authority in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022, in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
User
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Borrowings
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Grants
&
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
subsidies
. It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
had the highest point in four criteria. It is
also
noticeable that the figures for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
User
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rises
, while the data for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Borrowing
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Grants
&
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
subsidies
various through the period shown.

In 2012, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
finance
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
was highest, at around 1490
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
, followed by the figures for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Users
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Borrowings
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Grants
&
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
subsidies
, at
nearly
1000, 850, 490
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
respectively
. Four years later,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Users
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
Possible spelling mistake found.
witnessted
gradual
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rises
, to roughly 1600 and 1500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
, whilst the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Borrowings
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
an abrupt dip, standing at 600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
. Meanwhile, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
finance
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Grants
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
subsidies
increased
significantly
, after experiencing a slight
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rise
, at around 700 million.

In 2020,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenues
seemed to continue to increase
gradually
, with its data reaching approximately 2100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
. In 2022, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
finances
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
revenue
witness dramatic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rise
, at roughly 2400
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
. At the same time, the figure for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Borrowings
is predicted
to remained unchanged, standing at around 800
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
, whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
finance
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Grants
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
subsidies
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to drop
gently
.
In contrast
, that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Users
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
is forecasted
to increasing to about 2100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic finances for a local authority in New Zealand

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
220 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • finances for a local authority in New Zealand