Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Explain the graph for the consumption of the European countries. For meat ,chicken and lamb.

Explain the graph for the consumption of the European countries. For meat, chicken and lamb. Nr3LN

The shown graph demonstrates the change in the consumption of fish, chicken, beef and lamb in Europe country. The graph shows this change in the period of time, between 1979 and 2004. Starting with the fish consumption, it could be concluded that between 1979 and 2004, fish consumption rate relatively remains constant 50 grams. On the other hand, for chicken and the other two types of meat (beef, lamb), their consumption per person per week differs by time. In 1979 the consumption of lamb reaches to 150 grams, and then dramatically falls to 50 grams in 2004. On the contrary, the consumption of chicken enlarges since 1979. The consumption rate jumps from 150 to 250 grams in the period from 1979 to 2004. For the second type of meat (beef), the graph also shows reducing in the beef consumption between 1979 and 2004. The consumption in 2004 was only 100 grams against 200 grams in 1979 which reflects a huge decrease. In conclusion, the consumption of beef and meet rapidly decreased between 1979 and 2004. In contrast, the consumption rate of chicken showed a huge increase for the same time. While the consumption rate of the fish remained steady.

The shown graph demonstrates the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of fish, chicken, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 and lamb in Europe country. The graph This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 in the period of time, between 1979 and 2004.

Starting with the fish You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
, it could be concluded
 that between 1979 and 2004, fish You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
relatively
 remains constant 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
. On the other hand
, for chicken and the other two types of meat You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
(beef
, lamb), their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 per person per week differs by time. In 1979 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of lamb reaches to 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
, and then dramatically
 falls to 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 in 2004. On the contrary
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of chicken enlarges since 1979. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 jumps from 150 to 250 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 in the period from 1979 to 2004. For the second type of meat You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
(beef)
, the graph also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 reducing in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 between 1979 and 2004. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 in 2004 was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 100 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 against 200 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 in 1979 which reflects a huge decrease.

In conclusion
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :attain
meet
rapidly
 decreased between 1979 and 2004. In contrast
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of chicken This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 a huge increase for the same time. “While” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
While
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of the fish remained steady. 