Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Expenditure of Two Countries in 2010

Expenditure of Two Countries in 2010 5aXMB

The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five consumer goods (cars, computers, books, perfumes and cameras) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling. Overall, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period given. Both the British and the French spent most of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Furthermore, the most significant difference in expenditure between two countries was on cameras. In terms of cars, people in the UK spent 450, 000 on this as opposed to the French at 400, 000. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the French (around 400, 000 and 300, 000 respectively. In the UK, expenditure on cameras (just over 350, 000) was over double that of France, which was only 150, 000. On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Above 350, 000 was spent by the French on computer which was slightly more than the British who spent exactly 350, 000. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted for 200, 000 of expenditure in France but under 150, 000 in the UK. (204)

The chart illustrates the amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on five consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 (cars, computers, books, perfumes and cameras) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured
 in pounds sterling.

Overall
, the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 than France in the period This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
. Both the British and the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 most of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on cars whereas the least amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Furthermore
, the most significant difference in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 between two countries was on cameras.

In terms of cars, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 450, 000 on this as opposed to the French at 400, 000. Similarly
, the British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 was higher on books than the French Unpaired symbol: ')' seems to be missing
(
around 400, 000 and 300, 000 respectively
. In the UK, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on cameras (This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over 350, 000) was over double that of France, which was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 150, 000.

On the other hand
, the amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 paid out on the remaining This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 was higher in France. Above 350, 000 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 by the French on computer which was slightly
 more than the British who You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 exactly 350, 000. Neither of the countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 much on perfume which accounted for 200, 000 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 in France This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 under 150, 000 in the UK. (204)