Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

energy generation by fuel type

energy generation by fuel type yPBqg
The pie charts show the energy generation based on the type of fuel in Florida in 2007, with predictions for 2027. As can be seen in the charts, there is expected to be an upward trend in the rate of natural gas and nuclear, whereas the remaining fuel types are predicted to follow the opposite trend. The amount of energy generated by natural gas in 2007 stood at 38, 8%, while the figure for the energy generated from natural gas over a 20-year period will be slightly higher, at 54, 4%. Similarly, the percentage of energy generated by nuclear in 2027 will be 15, 9%, which was 4% higher than the rate of energy generated from nuclear in the year 2007. The amount of energy generated by renewables was 2. 1% in 2007, after 20 years, the energy generation based on renewables is expected to go down minimally to 1. 5% in 2027. Energy production from coal in 2007 was 29. 3%, by the year 2027, the percentage of coal is predicted to decrease slightly by one-fifth, at 23. 7%. In 2010, the proportion of energy generated by other fuel types was 11. 1%, over a period of 20 years, it is anticipated that other fuel types will see a significant decrease to 3. 4% in 2027. In 2027, energy production from oil is assumed to decrease steadily to 1. 1%, which was 5. 6% lower than the amount of the energy generation based on oil in 2007.
The pie charts
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generation based on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
type
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
in Florida in 2007, with predictions for 2027.

As can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
in the charts, there is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to be an upward trend in the rate of natural gas and nuclear, whereas the remaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
are predicted
to follow the opposite trend.

The amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
by natural gas in 2007 stood at 38, 8%, while the figure for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
from natural gas over a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
20-year
period will be
slightly
higher, at 54, 4%.
Similarly
, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
by nuclear in 2027 will be 15, 9%, which was 4% higher than the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
from nuclear in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2007.

The amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
by renewables was 2. 1% in 2007, after 20 years, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generation based on renewables is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to go down
minimally
to 1. 5% in 2027.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Energy
production from coal in 2007 was 29. 3%, by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2027, the percentage of coal
is predicted
to decrease
slightly
by one-fifth, at 23. 7%. In 2010, the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
generated
by other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
was 11. 1%, over a period of 20 years, it
is anticipated
that other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
types
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
a significant decrease to 3. 4% in 2027. In 2027,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
production from oil
is assumed
to decrease
steadily
to 1. 1%, which was 5. 6% lower than the amount of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generation based on oil in 2007.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic energy generation by fuel type

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
248 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • energy generation by fuel type