Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

“Each year, 13 boxers on average die in the ring ! ( Source : CNN ). These deaths are completely avoidable, if a complete ban on combat sports was implemented. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and Include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

“Each year, 13 boxers on average die in the ring! ( Source: CNN ). These deaths are completely avoidable, if a complete ban on combat sports was implemented. xxQy6
In the given statement the presented argument is that combat sports ought to be strictly prohibited as those can cause death among the participants. Obviously, a plethora of justifications can be found in favor and against this stand, but I am more inclined to disagree with it. To begin with, banning combat sports is not the answer, instead, the authority should make sure that the arenas and venues hosting those events are doing so maintaining the required safety standards. Risk is always involved with every kind of sporting activity and the instances are not rare to find when the players got injured while taking part in a sport that is considered safe. What's more, people can seriously hurt themselves while executing the most mundane duties of life like crossing a road or cooking a meal. Surely, the sensible course of action would not be to ban sports in general or abstain from walking or cooking, but to take adequate safety measures. It goes without saying, the government should not have the power to dictate which game is for the citizens to take part in, and an individual should have the freedom to engage in a rather dangerous activity without the undue interferences of the authority. Not to mention, thousands of people, including the players depend on those games to earn a living; thus, a complete ban would leave them jobless. On the other hand, an argument can be made that it is the responsibility of the government to make sure that the citizens are safe and as sports like boxing or wrestling can get deadly not only for the participants but also for the spectators, those ought to be banned. Some might even suggest people who enjoy those games should turn their attention to other safer activities. Except, safety precautions would be enough to maintain public safety, and we can not expect people to be monolithic in their choices. To sum up. I am convinced, in order to curb the number of fatalities, instead of banning the more practical and effective measure would be to impose safety measures and regulations.
In the
given
statement the presented argument is that combat
sports
ought to be
strictly
prohibited as those can cause death among the participants.
Obviously
, a plethora of justifications can
be found
in favor and against this stand,
but
I am more inclined to disagree with it. To
begin
with, banning combat
sports
is not the answer,
instead
, the authority should
make
sure that the arenas and venues hosting those
events
are doing
so
maintaining the required
safety
standards.
Risk
is always involved with every kind of sporting activity and the instances are not rare to find when the players
got
injured while taking part in a
sport
that
is considered
safe. What's more,
people
can
seriously
hurt themselves while executing the most mundane duties of life like crossing a road or cooking a meal.
Surely
, the sensible course of action would not be to ban
sports
in general
or abstain from walking or cooking,
but
to take adequate
safety
measures. It goes without saying, the
government
should not have the power to dictate which game is for the citizens to
take part
in, and an individual should have the freedom to engage in a
rather
dangerous
activity without the undue interferences of the authority. Not to mention, thousands of
people
, including the players depend on those games to earn a living;
thus
, a complete ban would
leave
them jobless.

On the other hand
, an argument can
be made
that it is the responsibility of the
government
to
make
sure that the citizens are safe and as
sports
like boxing or wrestling can
get
deadly not
only
for the participants
but
also
for the spectators, those ought to
be banned
.
Some
might even suggest
people
who enjoy those games should turn their attention to other safer activities. Except,
safety
precautions would be
enough
to maintain public
safety
, and we can not
expect
people
to be monolithic in their choices.

To sum up. I
am convinced
, in order to curb the number of fatalities,
instead
of banning the more practical and effective measure would be to impose
safety
measures and regulations.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic “Each year, 13 boxers on average die in the ring! ( Source: CNN ). These deaths are completely avoidable, if a complete ban on combat sports was implemented.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
350 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts