The first line chart illustrates how many train passengers were between 2000 and 2009 while the second line chart demonstrates the proportion of trains on time, the figures are depicted in millions and percentage respectively. Overall, it can be seen that the number of passengers fluctuated considerably and the rate of trains that were on time exceeded the target of 95% in four years incoherently during this period.
According to the first line graph, the number of train travellers started at a little over 35. After fluctuating between 35 and 40, it reached a peak at just over 45 in 2005. In the next three years, there was an upward trend in the number of train travellers, and it rose minimally by two at the end of the period.
By looking at the second graph, the trains' rate on time increased gradually and passed the target by four in four years. However, there was a plummet to 92 in 2006, but then it grew significantly to peak at 97 at the end of period.
The
first
line chart illustrates how
many
train
passengers were between 2000 and 2009 while the second line chart demonstrates the proportion of
trains
on time, the figures
are depicted
in millions and percentage
respectively
.
Overall
, it can be
seen
that the number of passengers fluctuated
considerably
and the rate of
trains
that were on time exceeded the target of 95% in four years
incoherently
during this period.
According to the
first
line graph, the number of
train
travellers
started
at a
little
over 35. After fluctuating between 35 and 40, it reached a peak at
just
over 45 in 2005. In the
next
three years, there was an upward trend in the number of
train
travellers
, and it rose
minimally
by two at the
end
of the period.
By looking at the second graph, the trains' rate on time increased
gradually
and passed the target by four in four years.
However
, there was a plummet to 92 in 2006,
but
then it grew
significantly
to peak at 97 at the
end
of period.