Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Comparison Of Different Kinds Of Energy Production In France

Comparison Of Different Kinds Of Energy Production In France paOny
The given pie charts show various sources from which energy was produced in France in the years 1995 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that in both years, coal and gas were the first and second most important sources of energy. While coal produced 29. 80% of energy in 1995, the contribution of gas was only marginally low at 29. 63%. In the same year, petrol accounted for 29. 27% of the total energy produced. Nuclear contributed 6. 40% and ‘others’ generated 4. 90% of the total energy. In 2005, coal and gas continued to occupy the first and second position and contributed 30. 93% and 30. 31% respectively of the total energy produced. While petrol remained the third biggest source of energy in this year, its contribution dipped from 29. 27% in 1995 to 19. 35% in 2005. Meanwhile, the amount of energy generated from nuclear and ‘others’ increased to 10. 10% and 9. 10% respectively. Overall, it can be seen that petrol lost some of its relevance as a source of energy over the 10-year period, while other sources like nuclear became more important.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
pie charts
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
various
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
from which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
in France in the years 1995 and 2005.
Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that in both years, coal and gas were the
first
and second most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. While coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
29. 80% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in 1995, the contribution of gas was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
marginally
low at 29. 63%. In the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, petrol accounted for 29. 27% of the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
. Nuclear contributed 6. 40% and ‘others’ generated 4. 90% of the total energy.

In 2005, coal and gas continued to occupy the
first
and second position and contributed 30. 93% and 30. 31%
respectively
of the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
. While petrol remained the third biggest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
, its contribution dipped from 29. 27% in 1995 to 19. 35% in 2005. Meanwhile, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated from nuclear and ‘others’ increased to 10. 10% and 9. 10%
respectively
.
Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that petrol lost
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of its relevance as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
10-year
period, while other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
like nuclear became more
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Comparison Of Different Kinds Of Energy Production In France

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
187 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Comparison Of Different Kinds Of Energy Production In France