Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Compare canadian donors of 2000 and 2015

Compare canadian donors of 2000 and 2015 2aXe6

The chart shown depicts information about people from Canada who donated money to charitable foundations, they are separated by ranges of age and compared in different years; 2000 and 2015. At first glance the most remarkable thing is that in 2000 in general terms there were more people who donated compared to 2015, also the most noticeable difference is in donations comes from the first group of age: 18-24, while the others remain with smaller differences between years. Also, we can highlight that the first 3 groups that are the younger ones had more donors in 2000 than in 2015, conversely, in 2015 the 2 older groups had more donors than in 2000. In 2000, the highest group of donors was 35-49 which were neither young nor that old, and the lowest quantity of donors was the younger group: 18-24. In 2015, the highest quantity of donors was in 50-64 group the adults who were about to enter to the elders group, while the lowest was also the younger group, however, with a remarkable difference between years and between ranges of age.

The chart shown depicts information about This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 from Canada who donated money to charitable foundations, they are separated
 by ranges of age and compared in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 years; 2000 and 2015.

At first
 glance the most remarkable thing is that in 2000 in general
 terms there were more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who donated compared to 2015, also
 the most noticeable difference is in donations This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 from the first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
 of age: 18-24, while the others remain with smaller differences between years.

Also
, we can highlight that the first
 3 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
groups
 that are the younger ones had more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontributorbenefactorpatronbacker
donors
 in 2000 than in 2015, conversely
, in 2015 the 2 older You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
groups
 had more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontributorbenefactorpatronbacker
donors
 than in 2000. In 2000, the highest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontributorbenefactorpatronbacker
donors
 was 35-49 which were neither young nor that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
, and the lowest quantity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontributorbenefactorpatronbacker
donors
 was the younger You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
: 18-24. In 2015, the highest quantity of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcontributorbenefactorpatronbacker
donors
 was in 50-64 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
 the adults who were about to enter to the elders You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
, while the lowest was also
 the younger You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodycrowdfactionclubcompanyband
group
, however
, with a remarkable difference between years and between ranges of age. 