In this letter, the author proposes an idea to increase property values in Deerhaven based on previous experience in Brookville. According to the author, since established regulations in Brookville about adorning yards and painting the exteriors of homes ensued by a rise in the average property values in Brookville, it would be a perfect solution to exploit in order to increase the property values in Deerhaven, too. However, the mentioned analogy is wanting in several aspects.
First of all, the increase in the value of houses in Brookville does not necessarily refer to the adopted restrictions. There could be a handful of other major reasons for the abrupt raise after the restrictions. For example, a couple of recreational projects could be started back at the time the community adopted the new rules. New pastime opportunities will attract more people and please the current residents according to which they would be convinced to stay rooted in their hometown and avoid migration. Besides, new infrastructure opportunities including railways, airports, secure roads and so forth can propel the growth of property value in a city. Thus, the author made his or her claim based on a quivering assumption.
Secondly, there are always conditions that can lead to specific results for a part of a country. To be more specific, a change in the value of the currency or the lack of construction materials resources somewhere near a region will affect the contrasting aspects of building a house. For instance, there might be a sudden plummet in the amount of iron or timber materials which resulted in an immediate growth in the value of houses. Furthermore, there might be an increase in the value of fuels for carrying the materials from other towns, too. As a result, there are other possibilities from diverse viewpoints for the rapid growth of the property values in Brookville, which could have nothing to do with the proposed legislation.
Thirdly, the author does not provide any reliable proof for his or her claim about the significant influences of novel regulations in Brookville. In fact, he or she fails to draw an authentic and solid relationship between his or her two sides of the comparison. The fact that some ventures had a particular outcome in one region serves no compelling reason to be successful in other areas, too. To put it simply, people of Brookville can possess distinct tastes in the appearance of their houses and might welcome the new rules. On the other hand, people of Deerhaven, might prefer some other features and have nothing in common with each other in taste and preference.
In conclusion, although the author’s suggestion may seem reasonable at first glance, it lacks significant extra information to be convincing enough. If he or she presented other data entailing the overall changes and improvements in the town since the restrictions have started, it could be more compelling. Otherwise, he or she did not consider other possible reasons for the phenomenon he or she explained.
In this letter, the
author
proposes an
idea
to
increase
property
values in
Deerhaven
based on previous experience in Brookville. According to the
author
, since established regulations in Brookville about adorning yards and painting the exteriors of homes ensued by a rise in the average
property
values in Brookville, it would be a perfect solution to exploit in order to
increase
the
property
values in
Deerhaven
, too.
However
, the mentioned analogy
is wanting
in several aspects.
First of all
, the
increase
in the
value
of
houses
in Brookville does not
necessarily
refer to the adopted restrictions. There could be a handful of
other
major reasons for the abrupt raise after the restrictions.
For example
, a couple of recreational projects could be
started
back at the time the community adopted the
new
rules
.
New
pastime opportunities will attract more
people
and
please
the
current
residents according to which they would
be convinced
to stay rooted in their hometown and avoid migration.
Besides
,
new
infrastructure opportunities including railways, airports, secure roads and
so
forth can propel the growth of
property
value
in a city.
Thus
, the
author
made
his or her
claim based on a quivering assumption.
Secondly
, there are always conditions that can lead to specific results for a part of a country. To be more specific, a
change
in the
value
of the currency or the lack of construction materials resources somewhere near a region will affect the contrasting aspects of building a
house
.
For instance
, there
might
be a sudden plummet in the amount of iron or timber materials which resulted in an immediate growth in the
value
of
houses
.
Furthermore
, there
might
be an
increase
in the
value
of fuels for carrying the materials from
other
towns, too.
As a result
, there are
other
possibilities from diverse viewpoints for the rapid growth of the
property
values in Brookville, which could have nothing to do with the proposed legislation.
Thirdly
, the
author
does not provide any reliable proof for
his or her
claim about the significant influences of novel regulations in Brookville. In fact, he or she fails to draw an authentic and solid relationship between
his or her
two sides of the comparison. The fact that
some
ventures had a particular outcome in one region serves no compelling reason to be successful in
other
areas, too. To put it
simply
,
people
of Brookville can possess distinct tastes in the appearance of their
houses
and
might
welcome the
new
rules
. On the
other
hand,
people
of
Deerhaven
,
might
prefer
some
other
features and have nothing in common with each
other
in taste and preference.
In conclusion
, although the
author’s
suggestion may seem reasonable at
first
glance, it lacks significant extra information to be convincing
enough
. If he or she presented
other
data entailing the
overall
changes
and improvements in the town since the restrictions have
started
, it could be more compelling.
Otherwise
, he or she did not consider
other
possible reasons for the phenomenon he or she
explained
.