Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe

The following appeared in a health newsletter. " A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe BJW76
In this letter, the author tells us a study shows there are doubled number of bicycle related accidents today than ten years ago, which focus that the people who wear helmet increased from 35 to 80 percent during the ten years. So the author recommended that the government should educate the riders and not encourage them to wear helmets. But there are some loopholes in this letter and the reasoning for the recommendation is not well supported. We should evalutate them carefully. To begin with, the study concentrated merely on the helmets wore by the riders without other significant issues. The author indicates during the ten years, the bicycle-related accidents are increasing as twice as it was. This obvious change may be not casued by the single reason that people feeling safe when thet are wearing helmets. There is a high possbility that the vehicles number is increasing in ten years, and the traffic accidents between the bikes and cars are often serious which means the helmets could not protect the riders well. So the author should find out what is the main cause of bicycle-related accidents. What's more, the road conditon is another impotant factors which could casuse the accidents as with more cars on the roads, the roads are more cramped than before, so the riders have to share the road with cars and even trucks, which more serious. In addition, the development of bicylcles should also be taken into considerations. Firstly, the number of bicycle may increase at the same time as the cars, the possbility of bicycle-related accidents will increase with high possiblity. Secondly, the bicycle technology may also evovle in the ten years. Maybe people ride little bicycle with a low speed, due to the development of bikes especcially bicylce sports, there may be more and more bicycle fans who feel like riding mountain bikes or the road bikes which are much more faster than before. This could also increase the possiblity of the accidents. While the study does not tell us this essential change, it would be arbitrary to make the conclusion. Finally, the author's recommendation is not well supported by the evidence. As we are discussing before, the author does not show convincing relevance to support his ideas that educate the riders and reduce the encouragements of wearing helmets. Even it is right to educate the people to ride bikes safely, we can not conclude the riders who lack of traffic rules will charge the doubled number of bicycle-related accidents. In that no evidence support this conclusion, all the people in the transportation should be cultivated carefully. Likewise, with no convincing evidence show the unneccety of wearing the helmets, it is too hasty to let the riders not wear them by the government. In conclusion, the author's recommendation is not well-supported by the evidence in that the reasons show no essential relavance to the conclsuion.
In this letter, the
author
tells
us a study
shows
there
are doubled
number
of
bicycle
related
accidents
today
than ten years ago, which focus that the
people
who wear
helmet
increased from 35 to 80 percent during the ten years.
So
the
author
recommended that the
government
should educate the
riders
and not encourage them to wear
helmets
.
But
there are
some
loopholes in this letter and the reasoning for the recommendation is not
well supported
. We should
evalutate
them
carefully
.

To
begin
with, the study concentrated
merely
on the
helmets
wore by the
riders
without other significant issues. The
author
indicates during the ten years, the bicycle-related
accidents
are increasing as twice as it was. This obvious
change
may be not
casued
by the single reason that
people
feeling safe when
thet are
wearing
helmets
. There is a high
possbility
that the vehicles
number
is increasing in ten years, and the traffic
accidents
between the
bikes
and
cars
are
often
serious which means the
helmets
could not protect the
riders
well.
So
the
author
should find out what is the main cause of bicycle-related
accidents
. What's more, the
road
conditon
is another
impotant
factors which could
casuse
the
accidents
as with more
cars
on the
roads
, the
roads
are more cramped than
before
,
so
the
riders
have to
share the
road
with
cars
and even trucks, which more serious.

In addition
, the development of
bicylcles
should
also
be taken
into considerations.
Firstly
, the
number
of
bicycle
may increase at the same time as the
cars
, the
possbility
of bicycle-related
accidents
will increase with high
possiblity
.
Secondly
, the
bicycle
technology may
also
evovle
in the ten years. Maybe
people
ride
little
bicycle
with a low speed, due to the development of
bikes
especcially
bicylce
sports, there may be more and more
bicycle
fans who feel like riding mountain
bikes
or the
road
bikes
which are much
more faster
than
before
. This could
also
increase the
possiblity
of the
accidents
. While the study does not
tell
us this essential
change
, it would be arbitrary to
make
the conclusion.

Finally
, the author's recommendation is not
well supported
by the
evidence
. As we are discussing
before
, the
author
does not
show
convincing relevance to support his
ideas
that educate the
riders
and
reduce
the encouragements of wearing
helmets
. Even it is right to educate the
people
to ride
bikes
safely
, we can not conclude the
riders
who lack of traffic
rules
will charge the doubled
number
of bicycle-related
accidents
. In that no
evidence
support this conclusion, all the
people
in the transportation should
be cultivated
carefully
.

Likewise
, with no convincing
evidence
show
the
unneccety
of wearing the
helmets
, it is too hasty to
let
the
riders
not wear them by the
government
.

In conclusion
, the author's recommendation is not well-supported by the
evidence
in that the reasons
show
no essential
relavance
to the
conclsuion
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS letter The following appeared in a health newsletter. " A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe

Letter
  American English
6 paragraphs
482 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: