Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Write an essay summarising and evaluating the key points from both texts. Use your own words throughout as far as possible, and include your own ideas in your answe. Some say that file-sharing websites have a detrimental effect on the music industry, whereas the truth is that it can held unknown artists to gain more audience. People still want to experience live music concerts because of its unifying features and uniqe ambience.

Write an essay summarising and evaluating the key points from both texts. Use your own words throughout as far as possible, and include your own ideas in your answe. Some say that file-sharing websites have a detrimental effect on the music industry, whereas the truth is that it can held unknown artists to gain more audience. People still want to experience live music concerts because of its unifying features and uniqe ambience. k6pBW
The two texts consider different facets of the music industry. The first one is concerned with the effects of illegal downloading, whereas the other outlines various reasons for a wide appeal of live music events. The first text busts the myth that unauthorised peer-to-peer file-sharing of copyrighted music works impairs the record industry. In fact, the author goes even further stating that those websites might be used as promotional platforms for upcoming artists who are not working with any music-industry leaders, thus helping them to gain audiences. Moreover, never before have we had such a wide variety of music genres and singers to opt for, hence it can contribute to boosting CD sales to everyone's taste. Although history is littered with examples which proved that file-sharing websites can really help unknown artists to rise to stardom, I still believe that it is unfair for proprietary material to be distributed for free, since illegal downloads are unprofitable for well-known artists and they consequently incur losses. The second text addresses a question of why irrespective of the availability of access to high-quality recordings and a myriad of uncomfortable aspects of visiting crowded live music gigs people continue be attracted to them. It presumes that it is some innate desire to establish a bond with like-minded people that triggers to share the physical experience of listening to their collective idols. It also emphasizes that more often than not the musicians play in new ways while performing live and therefore every concert has unique features which might excite fans who know the recorded versions by heart. I tend to agree wholeheartedly with the author as there is nothing which can be as exciting as singing all together with other fans the songs of your favourite band and seeing them performing live. Listening to a recording pales in comparison with that. In conclusion, the texts correctly highlight that although there are some concerns connected with online copyright infringement of famous artists, they will still attract millions of people to their live concerts.
The two
texts
consider
different
facets of the
music
industry. The
first
one
is concerned
with the effects of illegal downloading, whereas the other outlines various reasons for a wide appeal of
live
music
events
.

The
first
text
busts the myth that
unauthorised
peer-to-peer file-sharing of copyrighted
music
works impairs the record industry. In fact, the author goes even
further
stating that those websites might be
used
as promotional platforms for upcoming
artists
who are not working with any music-industry leaders,
thus
helping them to gain audiences.
Moreover
, never
before
have we had such a wide variety of
music
genres and singers to opt for,
hence
it can contribute to boosting CD sales to everyone's taste. Although history
is littered
with examples which proved that file-sharing websites can
really
help
unknown
artists
to rise to stardom, I
still
believe that it is unfair for proprietary material to
be distributed
for free, since illegal downloads are unprofitable for well-known
artists and
they
consequently
incur losses.

The second
text
addresses a question of why irrespective of the availability of access to high-quality recordings and a myriad of uncomfortable aspects of visiting crowded
live
music
gigs
people
continue
be attracted
to them. It presumes that it is
some
innate desire to establish a bond with like-minded
people
that triggers to share the physical experience of listening to their collective idols. It
also
emphasizes that more
often
than not the musicians play in new ways while performing
live
and
therefore
every concert has unique features which might excite fans who know the recorded versions by heart. I tend to
agree
wholeheartedly
with the author as there is nothing which can be as exciting as singing all together with other fans the songs of your
favourite
band and seeing them performing
live
. Listening to a recording pales
in comparison
with that.

In conclusion
, the
texts
correctly
highlight that although there are
some
concerns connected with online copyright infringement of
famous
artists
, they will
still
attract millions of
people
to their
live
concerts.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Write an essay summarising and evaluating the key points from both texts. Use your own words throughout as far as possible, and include your own ideas in your answe. Some say that file-sharing websites have a detrimental effect on the music industry, whereas the truth is that it can held unknown artists to gain more audience. People still want to experience live music concerts because of its unifying features and uniqe ambience.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
337 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts