It is argued that with the growing demand of some fossil fuels, actions should be taken to unlock new areas where such resources are expected to be available. I strongly disagree with this, because the extraction of these resources are harmful to nature, and such resources can be replaced with renewable ones.
The first reason why extraction of fuels from undiscovered region should not be allowed, is that this act is harmful for nature. One of the possible consequences of using undiscovered areas to access such resources will be deforestation. Deforestation then will affect the balance of environment, since trees contribute to the environment by playing the role of improving air quality and climate amelioration. Trees are essential to reduce the heat intensity of greenhouse effect by maintaining low levels of carbon dioxide. A recent report reveals that after a massive deforestation of some areas in North Australia the temperature has increased and there was a huge climate change compared to previous years.
The second reason why one can prevent exploring new areas for digging for such fuels because it is really unnecessary in the presence of other renewable sources. It is true that fuel is essential in our daily life but most countries now are trying to shift to clean resources. These renewable resources are more accessible and can easily found in nature. Renewable sources such as sun, wind, and water can play the same role as oil and gas, but they are less polluting and more environmentally friendly and moreover they are more economic. Reports has shown that the government of Canada has reduced the costs of fuel consumption when the government start depending more on water and wind energy sources, thus contributing well to the country economy.
In conclusion, there is no need to explore new areas to access fuels because such actions may lead to harmful impact on the environment and it was proven that renewable sources are good substitutes for these fuels
It
is argued
that with the growing demand of
some
fossil
fuels
, actions should
be taken
to unlock new
areas
where such resources are
expected
to be available. I
strongly
disagree with this,
because
the extraction of these resources are harmful to nature, and such resources can
be replaced
with
renewable
ones.
The
first
reason why extraction of
fuels
from undiscovered region should not be
allowed
, is that this act is harmful for nature. One of the possible consequences of using undiscovered
areas
to access such resources will be deforestation. Deforestation then will affect the balance of environment, since trees contribute to the environment by playing the role of improving air quality and climate amelioration. Trees are essential to
reduce
the heat intensity of greenhouse effect by maintaining low levels of carbon dioxide. A recent report reveals that after a massive deforestation of
some
areas
in North Australia the temperature has increased and there was a huge climate
change
compared to previous years.
The second reason why one can
prevent
exploring new
areas
for digging for such
fuels
because
it is
really
unnecessary in the presence of other
renewable
sources
. It is true that
fuel
is essential in our daily life
but
most countries
now
are trying to shift to clean resources. These
renewable
resources are more accessible and can
easily
found
in nature.
Renewable
sources
such as sun, wind, and water can play the same role as oil and gas,
but
they are less polluting and more
environmentally
friendly and
moreover
they are more economic.
Reports has
shown that the
government
of Canada has
reduced
the costs of
fuel
consumption when the
government
start
depending more on water and wind energy
sources
,
thus
contributing well to the country economy.
In conclusion
, there is no need to explore new
areas
to access
fuels
because
such actions may lead to harmful impact on the environment and it
was proven
that
renewable
sources
are
good
substitutes for these
fuels