Getting around a city by car or bicycle poses advantages and disadvantages. This essay will examine both before declaring a preference.
There are two obvious benefits to travelling around a city by car. The first is speed. For example, a car can get its driver from one side of a metropolis like New York City to the other in only a few hours. Cars also allow travelers to transport large numbers of items with them, a trait that is very useful to professionals commuting to and from work. These two abilities are simply not possible by bicycle. Thus, there is convincing support for the argument that cars are the optimal vehicle with which to travel around a city.
However, there are nevertheless several advantages to traversing a city by bicycle. For one, unlike a car, a bicycle does not produce harmful emissions, and this is much better for the cleanliness of a city. Bicycles are also small enough to navigate their way between cars, and this means they are less prone to delays due to traffic jams. In addition to this, their small size makes them easier to park, which can significantly reduce transportation related costs in a large city.
This discussion makes clear that both sides of the debate purport valid and convincing arguments that are relevant to the particular needs of the traveller, so it is difficult to declare one form of transport universally better than the other. In my personal case, transit via bicycle is best because I only travel short distances. Both cars and bicycles can be effective methods of city transport given specific circumstances. 
Getting around a city by  
car
 or  
bicycle
 poses advantages and disadvantages. This essay will examine both  
before
 declaring a preference.
There are two obvious benefits to travelling around a city by  
car
. The  
first
  is speed
.  
For example
, a  
car
 can  
get
 its driver from one side of a metropolis like New York City to the other in  
only
 a few hours.  
Cars
  also
  allow
 travelers to transport large numbers of items with them, a trait  
that is
  very
 useful to professionals commuting to and from work. These two abilities are  
simply
 not possible by  
bicycle
.  
Thus
, there is convincing support for the argument that  
cars
 are the optimal vehicle with which to travel around a city. 
However
, there are  
nevertheless
 several advantages to traversing a city by  
bicycle
. For one, unlike a  
car
, a  
bicycle
 does not produce harmful emissions, and this is much better for the cleanliness of a city.  
Bicycles
 are  
also
  small
  enough
 to navigate their way between  
cars
, and this means they are less prone to delays due to traffic jams.  
In addition
 to this, their  
small
 size  
makes
 them easier to park, which can  
significantly
  reduce
 transportation related costs in a large city.
This discussion  
makes
  clear
 that both sides of the debate purport valid and convincing arguments that are relevant to the particular needs of the  
traveller
,  
so
 it is difficult to declare one form of transport  
universally
 better than the other. In my personal case, transit via  
bicycle
 is best  
because
 I  
only
 travel short distances. Both  
cars
 and  
bicycles
 can be effective methods of city transport  
given
 specific circumstances.