Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

We need to have a lot of time to discuss on the matter of old buildings.

We need to have a lot of time to discuss on the matter of old buildings. VlDl7

We need to have a lot of time to discuss on the matter of old buildings. Some countries try to spend a plethora of money on the preserving of old building, while others prefer to spend money on new ones. As far as I can see the situation, Primarily, building new ones can be the efficient from the side of innovations. To be more clear that both inside and outside of building might be outfitted with technologies. Take for instance, while novel kinds of glasses will diminish energy utilization. Although, old buildings have its stand-out importance, quite possibly outworn structures may confront significant breakdowns whenever with no pre-notice. Consequently, a particularly transitory advance can never be ideal answer for this issue. As a second argument, I can say that new buildings can tackle most of countries’ problems which they have less areas. On the other hand, skyscrapers not only solve this kind of problems but also give opportunities for the countries to grow rapidly. Take an example, it would be the most ideal decision which authority supports the development of hypermarkets as opposed to customary stores. Notwithstanding surprising and appealing plan of classical structures, individuals are bound to favor live in current design. Hence, the distinction of high rises is higher than past structures. To conclude, repairing old accommodations cost plenty of money instead they should be broken and new building should be built.

We need to have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 time to discuss on the matter of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 countries try to spend a plethora of money on the preserving of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
, while others prefer to spend money on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonewhoever
ones
. As far as I can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 the situation,

Primarily
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonewhoever
ones
 can be the efficient from the side of innovations. To be more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that both inside and outside of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
 might be outfitted
 with technologies. Take for instance
, while novel kinds of glasses will diminish energy utilization. Although, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 have its stand-out importance, quite possibly
 outworn structures may confront significant breakdowns whenever with no Possible spelling mistake found.Prentice
pre-notice
. Consequently
, a particularly
 transitory advance can never be ideal answer for this issue.

As a second argument, I can say that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 can tackle After 'most of', you should use 'the' ("most of the countries") or simply say "most countries".most of the countriesmost countries
most of countries
’ problems which they have Did you mean "fewer"? The noun areas is countable.fewer
less
 areas. On the other hand
, skyscrapers not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 solve this kind of problems This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 give opportunities for the countries to grow rapidly
. Take an example, it would be the most ideal decision which authority supports the development of hypermarkets as opposed to customary stores. Notwithstanding surprising and appealing plan of classical structures, individuals are bound
 to favor This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
 design. Hence
, the distinction of high rises is higher than past structures.

To conclude
, repairing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgrayancienttiredelderlydecrepitvenerable
old
 accommodations cost This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
plenty
 of money instead
 they should be broken
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlatedifferentstate-of-the-artmodernunusualunfamiliar
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
building
 should be built
. 