Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Using animals for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between animal rights advocates and others that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at human life.

Using animals for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between animal rights advocates and others that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at human life. RNWB8
Using animals for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between animal rights advocates and others that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at human life. Personally I don't agree with extremism in both views. Killing indiscriminately animals is not defendable. Given the growth of the population all around the world, consumption of meat food has increased. According to the animals defenders, it is an alert, because animals as innocent creatures must have the living right like humans. Moreover, some species are dramatrically endangered of extinction due to illegal hunting. Also, applying animals for the scientific researchs in labroratories is considered selfish behavior, because a large number of them are killed each year. In my view, alternative foods such as verbal foods can reduce the rate of animals killing. On the other hand, supporters of using animals will protect human from possible calamities such as starving. In fact a huge valume of human foods are provided by meat, since vegetal foods aren't enough for all people across the world. without animals definitely mice, scientific progresses could achieve, as well. In modern medicine various drugs and remedies have been made with several experiments on animals in laboratories. In conclusion, in order to cease the permanent discussion among two diffetent views about protecting animals or using them for human needs, I believe we need a balanced view that helps animals to be alive as much as possible. For instance subtitutional eidible product are recommended.
Using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
rights advocates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
and others
that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
life.
Personally
I don't
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with extremism in both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
views
. Killing
indiscriminately
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is not
Possible spelling mistake found.
defendable
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Given
the growth of the population all around the world, consumption of meat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
has increased. According to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
defenders, it is an alert,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as innocent creatures
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
have the living right like
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
species are
Possible spelling mistake found.
dramatrically
endangered of extinction due to illegal hunting.
Also
, applying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for the scientific
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "researches", the plural form of the noun 'research'?
researchs
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
labroratories
is considered
selfish behavior,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"
a large number of
them
are killed
each year. In my
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
, alternative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
foods
such as verbal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
foods
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
killing.

On the other hand
, supporters of using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
will protect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
from possible calamities such as starving. In fact a huge
Possible spelling mistake found.
valume
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
foods
are provided
by meat, since
Possible spelling mistake found.
vegetal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
foods
aren't
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
for all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
across the world.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
definitely mice, scientific progresses could achieve,
as well
. In modern medicine various drugs and remedies have
been made
with several experiments on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in laboratories.

In conclusion
, in order to cease the permanent discussion among two
Possible spelling mistake found.
diffetent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
views
about protecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
or using them for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
needs, I believe we need a balanced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to be alive as much as possible.
For instance
Possible spelling mistake found.
subtitutional
Possible spelling mistake found.
eidible
product
are recommended
.

IELTS essay Using animals for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between animal rights advocates and others that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at human life.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
248 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
4.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Using animals for mankind needs has always been a significant issue between animal rights advocates and others that believe these alive creatures are necessary for edible products and farming at human life.