It goes without saying that learning social coping mechanisms is an essential skill for every society member. One aspect of such skill is reflected in debates, discussions, seminars and classrooms in which people talk about topics and share their opinions. The question is how we should act in situations when teacher or meeting leader points out something incorrect in our views. A person's approach to address this question may vary tremendously from mind to mind. In my perspective and as far as I am concerned, I hold the idea that waiting for the class to be over and then talking to the teacher or meeting leader is the best behavior as maybe my opinion is flawed in the first place or interrupting the teacher may cause disturbance for others.
To begin with, as I mentioned earlier, there is no sure way to prove that my opinion is right and logical in the first place. In other words, we all experienced situations in which we had wrong opinion on the matter, but at first, we were certain that our opinion was correct. To make it more clear, take my personal experience as a case in point. I remember I was attending an office meeting about strategic decisions regarding events that had occurred in our industry and field of activity. In the middle of the session, the meeting leader noted a number of information as basis for our discussion. However, in my view, these information were not correct and had serious weaknesses. Therefore, I interrupted him by pointing out some of these weaknesses. Consequently, he took the time to explain how the information were, in fact, correct and reliable. After his elaboration, I realized my mistake for having such incorrect opinion. In this sense and from that session, I always check my assumption on matter first as my opinion may be wrong and flawed.
Moreover, by waiting for the meeting or class to be over, and then talking to the teacher or meeting leader, I help him/her to keep his/her train of thought in that situation and preventing unnecessary interruptions. To make it more clear, imagine if every person in the session interrupted the teacher or meeting leader as soon as they thought something is wrong in their views. As a result, the session would not be as effective as it should be. Also, in this situation, people get frustrated and want the session to be over as quickly as possible. With that being said, I highly believe that waiting for the meeting or class to be over, and then talking to the teacher or meeting leader is the right behavior.
To put the aforementioned in a nutshell, whether be for wrong assumptions and opinions or preventing unnecessary interruptions, I highly hold the idea that waiting for the session to be over, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader is the best possible choice.
It goes without saying that learning social coping mechanisms is an essential
skill
for every society member. One aspect of such
skill
is reflected
in debates, discussions, seminars and classrooms in which
people
talk about topics and share their
opinions
. The question is how we should act in
situations
when
teacher
or
meeting
leader
points out something incorrect in our views. A person's approach to address this question may vary
tremendously
from mind to mind. In my perspective and as far as I
am concerned
, I hold the
idea
that
waiting
for the
class
to be
over
and then talking to the
teacher
or
meeting
leader
is the best behavior as maybe my
opinion
is flawed
in the
first
place or interrupting the
teacher
may cause disturbance for others.
To
begin
with, as I mentioned earlier, there is no sure way to prove that my
opinion
is right and logical in the
first
place.
In other words
, we all experienced
situations
in which we had
wrong
opinion
on the matter,
but
at
first
, we were certain that our
opinion
was correct. To
make
it more
clear
, take my personal experience as a case in point. I remember I was attending an office
meeting
about strategic decisions regarding
events
that had occurred in our industry and field of activity. In the middle of the
session
, the
meeting
leader
noted a number of information as basis for our discussion.
However
, in my view,
these information were
not correct and had serious weaknesses.
Therefore
, I interrupted him by pointing out
some
of these weaknesses.
Consequently
, he took the time to
explain
how the information were, in fact, correct and reliable. After his elaboration, I realized my mistake for having such incorrect
opinion
. In this sense and from that
session
, I always
check
my assumption on matter
first
as my
opinion
may be
wrong
and flawed.
Moreover
, by
waiting
for the
meeting
or
class
to be
over
, and then talking to the
teacher
or
meeting
leader
, I
help
him/her to
keep
his/her train of
thought
in that
situation
and preventing unnecessary interruptions. To
make
it more
clear
, imagine if every person in the
session
interrupted the
teacher
or
meeting
leader
as
soon
as they
thought
something is
wrong
in their views.
As a result
, the
session
would not be as effective as it should be.
Also
, in this
situation
,
people
get
frustrated and want the
session
to be
over
as
quickly
as possible. With that
being said
, I
highly
believe that
waiting
for the
meeting
or
class
to be
over
, and then talking to the
teacher
or
meeting
leader
is the right behavior.
To put the aforementioned in a nutshell, whether be for
wrong
assumptions and
opinions
or preventing unnecessary interruptions, I
highly
hold the
idea
that
waiting
for the
session
to be
over
, and then talk to the
teacher
or
meeting
leader
is the best possible choice.