The material discusses the concept of buzzing, which the advertising companies have started to use to sell their ptoducts. While the reading says that this approach has many critics and should be banned, the lisiening disagrees and mentions that it is a wrong imperssion.
First, the author states that buzzers many not say the truth because this they are paid to sell products. On the other hand, the speaker opposes this and posits that advertising companies find these buzzers in people who used thier products and liked them. The listening adds that he is a buzzer for the company of his phone becasue he used and got impressed about it. The professor explains that; however, he is paid for this service, the phone is realy great.
Second, the reading states that consumers pay less attention to buzzers. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and points out that customers listen carefully to buzzers and ask various questions about prices, services and how long dida buzzer use a product. The professor explains that if he could not answer these questions, consumers will not buy the product.
Third, the writer mentions that buzzers could destroy social relationships. Conversely, the speaker contradicts this and contends that it is a stupid thought. The lecturer explains that he is a buzzer for a specific phone that he used it before and loved it. The professor adds that if the costumer use this phone, he will love it for sure. The speaker concludes that customers will trust him more and become open to people.
The material discusses the concept of buzzing, which the advertising
companies
have
started
to
use
to sell their
ptoducts
. While the reading says that this approach has
many
critics and should
be banned
, the
lisiening
disagrees and mentions that it is a
wrong
imperssion
.
First
, the author states that buzzers
many
not say the truth
because
this they
are paid
to sell products.
On the other hand
, the speaker opposes this and posits that advertising
companies
find these buzzers in
people
who
used
thier
products and liked them. The listening
adds
that he is a buzzer for the
company
of his
phone
becasue
he
used
and
got
impressed about it. The professor
explains
that;
however
, he
is paid
for this service, the
phone
is
realy
great.
Second, the reading states that consumers pay less attention to buzzers.
On the contrary
, the lecturer refutes this and points out that customers listen
carefully
to buzzers and ask various questions about prices, services and how long
dida
buzzer
use
a product. The professor
explains
that if he could not answer these questions, consumers will not
buy
the product.
Third, the writer mentions that buzzers could
destroy
social relationships.
Conversely
, the speaker contradicts this and contends that it is a stupid
thought
. The lecturer
explains
that he is a buzzer for a specific
phone
that he
used
it
before
and
loved
it. The professor
adds
that if the costumer
use
this
phone
, he will
love
it for sure.
The
speaker concludes that customers will trust him more and become open to
people
.