The article states the efficient way of using one of the naturally available substance, hydrogen for running the automobiles instead of using internal combustion engine. It also states three main advantages of using the hydrogen based and fuel cell engine. However, the professor refutes the facts stated in article and also gives three reasons to prove how the article is wrong in its stand.
First, the article states that petroleum is one of the resource which is non-renewable and as a solution, a renewable resource, that is usage of hydrogen fuel-celled should be adopted. The professor however confutes the solution stated. Even though the professor agrees upon that petroleum is finite, she argues that process of obtaining the hydrogen in the consumable form is very tedious. Although hydrogen is readily available in the nature, it is not in the usable state. To obtain the pure form of hydrogen, in the liquid state, purification process has to take place and this hydrogen liquid should be kept under very cold temperature at minus 253 degree Celsius. For this it would require sophisticated lab requirements and its also not practical.
Second, the article states that the usage of hydrogen based fuels would reduce the pollution. While the professor deny this saying that the usage of hydrogen based fuels indirectly lead to the pollution. This is because the process involved in the manufacture of the liquid hydrogen would require more energy like oil, coal and other resources which would result in the pollution. She argue using hydrogen based fuels would not solve the problem of pollution control.
Third, the article averts that usage of fuel-cell engine would improve the economy. Whereas, the professor opposes this statement too. She says that manufacturing fuel cell is done by decomposing the platinum and hints that platinum is very very expensive. She also says that without platinum, the hydrogen would not decompose and she also indicated till today this process has never succeeded.
The
article
states
the efficient way of using one of the
naturally
available substance, hydrogen for running the automobiles
instead
of using internal combustion engine. It
also
states
three main advantages of using the hydrogen based and
fuel
cell engine.
However
, the
professor
refutes the facts stated in
article
and
also
gives three reasons to prove how the
article
is
wrong
in its stand.
First
, the
article
states
that petroleum is one of the resource which is non-renewable and as a solution, a renewable resource,
that is
usage
of hydrogen fuel-celled should
be adopted
. The
professor
however
confutes the solution stated.
Even though
the
professor
agrees
upon that petroleum is finite, she argues that
process
of obtaining the hydrogen in the consumable form is
very
tedious. Although hydrogen is
readily
available in the nature, it is not in the usable
state
. To obtain the pure form of hydrogen, in the liquid
state
, purification
process
has to
take place and this hydrogen liquid should be
kept
under
very
cold
temperature at minus 253 degree Celsius. For this it would require sophisticated lab requirements and its
also
not practical.
Second, the
article
states
that the
usage
of hydrogen based
fuels
would
reduce
the
pollution
.
While
the
professor
deny this saying that the
usage
of hydrogen based
fuels
indirectly
lead to the
pollution
. This is
because
the
process
involved in the manufacture of the liquid hydrogen would require more energy like oil, coal and other resources which would result in the
pollution
. She
argue
using hydrogen based
fuels
would not solve the problem of
pollution
control.
Third, the
article
averts that
usage
of fuel-cell engine would
improve
the economy.
Whereas
, the
professor
opposes this statement too. She says that manufacturing
fuel
cell
is done
by decomposing the platinum and hints that platinum is
very
very
expensive. She
also
says that without platinum, the hydrogen would not
decompose and
she
also
indicated till
today
this
process
has never succeeded.