Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Essay topics: TPO-08 - Integrated Writing TaskToward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people,

Essay topics: TPO-08 - Integrated Writing TaskToward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, Nr37y
The article claims that memoir by Chevalier is skeptical. It casts doubt upon the instances and also states three such examples. While, the professor, disagrees with the article and supports the facts stated in memoir and also gives gives reason for holding such opinions. The professor states the memoir written by Chevalier is reliable and also gives three instances where she is supporting the incidents stated be Chevalier in his memoir. First, the article states that Chevalier had borrowed money when he was in Switzerland and was not wealthy as said in his memoir. However, the professor argues that whatever written in the memoir might be possibly correct. The professor says that Chevalier was not poor and he had assets. The professor claims that it took a little while to get those assets converted into money. Second, the article casts doubt on the conversation between Chevalier and Voltire. It states that it cannot be trusted because the extended conversation between two people cannot be accurately stated. However, professor refutes this claim. She says that Chevalier had the habit of making notes of any conversation made on that that day. He also use to refer these notes later when he wanted to add them in his works. Professor asserts that whatever conversations written in the memoir are exact. Third, the article suspects incident of great escape form the prison in Venice. The article suspects that Chevalier might have bribed in order to escape form the prison since he had political power. Whereas, the professor confutes by saying that there are records that showed that there were other people in that jail who were more powerful than Chevalier. The professor also hints about the one more record that reveals that government invested on repairing the ceiling of the prison after Chevalier escaped by making a hole in the ceiling. This means Chevalier escaped by making hole in the ceiling and not by bribing.
The
article
claims that
memoir
by Chevalier is skeptical. It casts doubt upon the instances and
also
states
three such examples. While, the
professor
, disagrees with the
article
and supports the facts stated in
memoir
and
also
gives gives
reason for holding such opinions. The
professor
states
the
memoir
written by Chevalier is reliable and
also
gives three instances where she is supporting the incidents stated be Chevalier in his memoir.

First
, the
article
states
that Chevalier had borrowed money when he was in Switzerland and was not wealthy as said in his
memoir
.
However
, the
professor
argues that whatever written in the
memoir
might be
possibly
correct. The
professor
says that Chevalier was not
poor and
he had assets. The
professor
claims that it took a
little
while to
get
those assets converted into money.

Second, the
article
casts doubt on the
conversation
between Chevalier and
Voltire
. It
states
that it cannot
be trusted
because
the extended
conversation
between two
people
cannot be
accurately
stated.
However
,
professor
refutes this claim. She says that Chevalier had the habit of making notes of any
conversation
made on that that day. He
also
use to
refer these notes later when he wanted to
add
them in his works.
Professor
asserts that whatever
conversations
written in the
memoir
are exact.

Third, the
article
suspects incident of great escape
form
the prison in Venice. The
article
suspects that Chevalier might have bribed in order to escape
form
the prison since he had political power.
Whereas
, the
professor
confutes by saying that there are records that
showed
that there were other
people
in that jail who were more powerful than Chevalier. The
professor
also
hints about the one more record that reveals that
government
invested on repairing the ceiling of the prison after Chevalier escaped by making a hole in the ceiling. This means Chevalier escaped by making hole in the ceiling and not by bribing.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Essay topics: TPO-08 - Integrated Writing TaskToward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people,

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: