Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

TOEFL Sample essay : integrated essay from TPO6

TOEFL Sample essay: integrated essay from TPO6 YLmEK
Regarding the reading, communal online encyclopedias has a lot of problems that make them much less valuable than traditional printed encyclopedias. In contrast, the professor believes that the author's reasons are prodigious against the communal online encyclopedias, therefor he refuted the author's reasons due to three concrete pieces of evidences. First, that contributors to a communal online encyclopedias often lack the academic credentials backgrounds leading to an inaccurate content, based on what the reading claims, is refuted by the professor. He stated that if someone was to look for an error free source of information, he would never find such a source. She added that an error in communal online encyclopedias could be corrected, while an error in a printed form will stay for decades. Second, the reading states that communal online encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals the opportunity to corrupt the text information. Quiet the reverse, the professor mentions that communal online encyclopedias protects the crucial fact in a reading only format that no one could reach it or edit it. Also she added that the encyclopedias hire special editors who view the editing in order to confirm the good one and delete the others. Finally, according to the reading communal online encyclopedias usually focus too much on trivial and popular topic giving a false impression of what is important. The professor casts doubt on this issue by saying that because of the limited space for traditional encyclopedias, they are force to decide what subject to include and what is not to be published. She added that the unlimited space for the online encyclopedias is not a problem and it serve as one of the biggest advantage for it.
Regarding the
reading
, communal
online
encyclopedias has
a lot of
problems that
make
them much less valuable than traditional printed encyclopedias.
In contrast
, the
professor
believes that the author's reasons are prodigious against the communal
online
encyclopedias, therefor he refuted the author's reasons due to three concrete pieces of evidences.

First
, that contributors to a communal
online
encyclopedias
often
lack the academic credentials backgrounds leading to an inaccurate content, based on what the
reading
claims,
is refuted
by the
professor
. He stated that if someone was to look for an error free source of information, he would never find such a source. She
added
that an error in communal
online
encyclopedias could
be corrected
, while an error in a printed form will stay for decades.

Second, the
reading
states that communal
online
encyclopedias gives unscrupulous users and vandals the opportunity to corrupt the text information. Quiet the reverse, the
professor
mentions that communal
online
encyclopedias protects the crucial fact in a
reading
only
format that no one could reach it or edit it.
Also
she
added
that the encyclopedias hire special editors who view the editing in order to confirm the
good
one and delete the others.

Finally
, according to the
reading
communal
online
encyclopedias
usually
focus too much on trivial and popular topic giving a false impression of what is
important
. The
professor
casts doubt on this issue by saying that
because
of the limited space for traditional encyclopedias, they are force
to decide
what subject to include and what is not to
be published
. She
added
that the unlimited space for the
online
encyclopedias is not a problem and it
serve
as one of the biggest advantage for it.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay TOEFL Sample essay: integrated essay from TPO6

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
281 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: