The reading passage is about how devising a precise and well-structured system of
rewarding improves productivity in a business. According to the reading, this
reward can be in form of money, financial assistance, or job-related privileges.
However, the professor points out some drawbacks of such tact and casts doubt on
the points made by the passage.
For the beginning, the professor explains that a rewarding system may result in
counter-productivity, instead of boosting efficacy. He suggests that a reward will be
perceived as a punishment, and the workers may feel as they are being controlled and
manipulated. The more the reward is greater, the more the disappointment from not
achieving it will be. Taking into account that most of the workers are not going to win
the reward, leaves us with the fact that in long term the workforce will be significantly
unsatisfied, and will feel like being punished. This is contrary to the passage that claims
the bigger the reward is, the higher the productivity will be.
Moreover, the professor explicitly highlights that the rewarding system will jeopardize
the collaborative works. He gives an example of an employee, who may not inform his
supervisor of an error, which he has made, in order to secure the possibility of winning
the reward for good performance. This undermines the premise of the passage that
believes the motivation provided by such incentives improves the attitudes of the
employees.
The reading passage is about how devising a precise and well-structured system of
rewarding
improves
productivity in a business. According to the reading,
this
reward
can be in form of money, financial assistance, or job-related privileges.
However
, the professor points out
some
drawbacks of such tact and casts doubt on
the
points made by the passage.
For the beginning, the professor
explains
that a rewarding system may result in
counter-productivity
,
instead
of boosting efficacy. He suggests that a
reward
will
be
perceived as a punishment, and the workers may feel as they are
being controlled
and
manipulated
. The more the
reward
is greater, the more the disappointment from
not
achieving
it will be. Taking into account that most of the workers are not going to
win
the
reward
,
leaves
us with the fact that in long term the workforce will be
significantly
unsatisfied
, and will feel like
being punished
. This is contrary to the passage that
claims
the
bigger the
reward
is, the higher the productivity will be.
Moreover
, the professor
explicitly
highlights that the rewarding system will jeopardize
the
collaborative works. He gives an example of an employee, who may not inform
his
supervisor of an error, which he has made, in order to secure the possibility of winning
the
reward
for
good
performance. This undermines the premise of the passage
that
believes the motivation provided by such incentives
improves
the attitudes of the
employees
.