Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Of late, the increasing influx of vehicles poses a great menace to environment across the world. Many assert that hiking oil prices would probably eliminate some dangers to the eco system. Nevertheless, in my opinion, this idea is an ineffective one which would rather adversely affect the common people. On the one hand, it is true that the fuel price increment might reduce the usage of vehicles to some extent. This is because middle class people will approach public transports and other alternatives at lower costs. It may result in the control of emission of smoke and gases that hugely damages the living world. Thus, it might prevent further environmental degradation. On the other hand, it is undeniable that this tendency may make a trivial impact as most of the cars and vehicles are owned by the rich. For instance, New Delhi, the capital of India, where the government has recently amended this act, still stands taller in the list of highly polluted cities. In addition, even if the rates of oils are skyrocketing, the wealthy car owners can still afford it. Hence, I would say that it will hardly yield a desired outcome. I also believe that this trend would contrarily exert influence on commoners' life. Owing to a hefty fuel toll, the diverse range of trades will surely be affected which would eventually rise the fare of basic necessities. Moreover, the factors such as deforestation, industrial emissions and so on primarily cause a great havoc on the natural world. For example, the more people vandalise the forests, the worse the effects will be. So, it is baseless to implement this act into society. To conclude, as this is incoherent due to its negligible positive result, the governments should come up forward with constructive measures in order to prevent detrimental effects on the eco system.
Of late, the increasing influx of vehicles poses a great menace to environment across the world.
Many
assert that hiking oil prices would
probably
eliminate
some
dangers
to the
eco system
.
Nevertheless
, in my opinion, this
idea
is an ineffective one which would
rather
adversely
affect the common
people
.

On the one hand, it is true that the fuel price increment might
reduce
the usage of vehicles to
some
extent. This is
because
middle
class
people
will approach public transports and other alternatives at lower costs. It may result in the control of emission of smoke and gases that
hugely
damages the living world.
Thus
, it might
prevent
further
environmental degradation.
On the other hand
, it is undeniable that this tendency may
make
a trivial impact as most of the cars and vehicles are
owned
by the rich.
For instance
, New Delhi, the capital of India, where the
government
has recently amended this act,
still
stands taller in the list of
highly
polluted cities.
In addition
, even if the rates of oils are skyrocketing, the wealthy car owners can
still
afford it.
Hence
, I would say that it will hardly yield a desired outcome.

I
also
believe that this trend would
contrarily
exert influence on commoners' life. Owing to a hefty fuel toll, the diverse range of trades will
surely
be
affected
which would
eventually
rise the fare of
basic necessities
.
Moreover
, the factors such as deforestation, industrial emissions and
so
on
primarily
cause a great havoc on the natural world.
For example
, the more
people
vandalise
the forests, the worse the effects will be.
So
, it is baseless to implement this act into society.

To conclude
, as this is incoherent due to its negligible
positive
result, the
governments
should
come
up forward with constructive measures in order to
prevent
detrimental effects on the
eco system
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart.
Nelson Mandela

IELTS essay To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
306 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts