Since the establishment of a constitution in many nations, numerous leaders have come forward through the natural elective process as per the laws of nation and legislations. It is always a controversial issue since the beginning that whether male leaders have moved forward the country more into the chaos, conflicts and violence rather than the female who can better lead the nation in an appropriate manner. I believe that leadership has nothing to do relate with the gender and country can be governed better through the leadership abilities and skills.
To commence with, many developed countries have observed that since the time they become independent and creation of the constitution which led them to choose a leader who can lead the public. The president or prime minister can facilitate their province with the development of each and every sector which could be helpful for their citizens to thrive vigorously. Similarly, history suggests that men who have come in power have used their influence in a negative way. According to a research conducted by a team of experts shows that men have to lead the nation towards the war and created more conflicts and clashes between religions, community and country for the sake of their own benefit. For instance, leaders like Hitler and Saddam Hussain have generated massive devastation and evoke their own people to join them in the war.
Moreover, some people opine that women leaders have a calm nature, a better understanding of leadership and can handle any situation in a peaceful way than men leaders. In addition, they can prevail peace and bring prosperity in the nation. On the contrary, some of the female prime ministers have bad records and their names have involved in violence, conflicts and riots activities which had led the country in reverse development. For example, prime ministers of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh women leaders are involved in high corruption cases and they arise riots and conflicts between different religions. However, leadership has nothing to do with gender inequivalence, whereas leaders are born through natural abilities or gain skills through experience and training.
In conclusion, as per my viewpoint, management qualities are gain through a certain amount of knowledge, training and experience. Leadership is a major responsibility and it should not elect the leader on the basis of gender.
Since the establishment of a constitution in
many
nations
, numerous
leaders
have
come
forward
through
the natural elective process as per the laws of
nation
and
legislations
. It is always a controversial issue since the beginning that whether male
leaders
have
moved
forward the
country
more into the chaos,
conflicts
and violence
rather
than the female who can better lead the
nation
in an appropriate manner
. I believe that
leadership
has nothing to do relate with the gender and
country
can
be governed
better
through
the
leadership
abilities and
skills
.
To commence with,
many
developed
countries
have observed that since the time they become independent and creation of the constitution which led them to choose a
leader
who can lead the public. The president or prime minister can facilitate their province with the development of each and every sector which could be helpful for their citizens to thrive
vigorously
.
Similarly
, history suggests that
men
who have
come
in power have
used
their influence in a
negative
way. According to
a research
conducted by a team of experts
shows
that
men
have to
lead the
nation
towards the war and created more
conflicts
and clashes between religions, community and
country
for the sake of their
own
benefit.
For instance
,
leaders
like Hitler and Saddam Hussain have generated massive devastation and evoke their
own
people
to
join
them in the war.
Moreover
,
some
people
opine that women
leaders
have a calm nature, a better understanding of
leadership
and can handle any situation
in a peaceful way
than
men
leaders
.
In addition
, they can prevail peace and bring prosperity in the
nation
.
On the contrary
,
some of the
female prime ministers have
bad
records and their names have involved in violence,
conflicts
and riots activities which had led the
country
in reverse development.
For example
, prime ministers of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh women
leaders
are involved
in high corruption
cases and
they arise riots and
conflicts
between
different
religions.
However
,
leadership
has nothing to do with gender
inequivalence
, whereas
leaders
are born
through
natural abilities or gain
skills
through
experience and training.
In conclusion
, as per my viewpoint, management qualities are gain
through
a certain amount of knowledge, training and experience.
Leadership
is a major responsibility and it should not elect the
leader
on the basis of gender.