The speaker contradicts the points with regards to competition as stated in the passage by giving reasons and examples. according to passage competition is good and has several benefits whereas lecture is challanging by explaining harmful effects of it.
Firstly he points out that as per passage increase in competition will increase motivation. athlets perform well ehen they are given chance to train or compet with higher qualfied athlets. however this, according to speakeker is misconception. In reality he explicits that most of studies showed that competition has increased performance anxiety with increasing chances of cleating. Furthermore, self esteem will be lowered
Secondly, speaker oppses the information given in the passage. Competitors push each other to excel and due to this productivity will be increased. Number of books read in the class having competition has given higher results than other classroom having no race for reading. it is quiet contrary because in one study cooperation has given higher results than competition in. 25% of study group said that there is no differennce between both. Majority of group showed that cooperation is more effective to increase productivity.
Thirdly he denies the validity of the point that was avered in the passage with regards to having fun while playing group competition games like quiz, science project, and spelling bees. however speaker said that in past it was fun but as of now addiction of winning game took over fun. Only winners have fun and loosers don’t.
Last but not least speaker suggests that by keeeping fun we can avoid bad outcome. Hence in conclusion, speaker lucidly substantiates his points of view with cogency.
The speaker contradicts the
points
with regards to
competition
as stated in the
passage
by giving reasons and examples.
according
to
passage
competition
is
good
and has several benefits whereas lecture is
challanging
by explaining harmful effects of it.
Firstly
he
points
out that as per
passage
increase in
competition
will increase motivation.
athlets
perform well
ehen
they are
given
chance to train or
compet
with higher
qualfied
athlets
.
however
this, according to
speakeker
is misconception. In
reality he
explicits
that
most of studies
showed
that
competition
has increased performance anxiety with increasing chances of
cleating
.
Furthermore
,
self esteem
will
be lowered
Secondly
, speaker
oppses
the information
given
in the
passage
. Competitors push each other to excel and due to this productivity will
be increased
. Number of books read in the
class
having
competition
has
given
higher results than other classroom having no race for reading.
it
is
quiet
contrary
because
in one study cooperation has
given
higher results than
competition
in. 25% of study group said that there is no
differennce
between both. Majority of group
showed
that cooperation is more effective to increase productivity.
Thirdly
he denies the validity of the
point
that was
avered
in the
passage
with regards to
having
fun
while playing group
competition
games like quiz, science project, and spelling bees.
however
speaker said that in past it was
fun
but
as of
now
addiction of winning game took over
fun
.
Only
winners have
fun
and
loosers
don’t.
Last
but
not
least
speaker suggests that by
keeeping
fun
we can avoid
bad
outcome.
Hence
in conclusion
, speaker
lucidly
substantiates his
points
of view with cogency.