The reading claims that the science of archaeology dedicated to uncovering as studying old cultural artifacts in Britian was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain and it provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that in 1990 new rules and guidelines are adapted to improve the archaeology field. She refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article avers that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the new guidelines state that when construction starts, the location should be examined before the construction. If the area has valuable and interestiong artifacts for archaeologists, they should build a fence and to make plane to search in the location. In fact, they may make excavation and documents before the construction proceed.
Second, the passage asserts that many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. On the other hand, the speaker counters this point by stating that with new rules, the archaeological research will be paid by a construction company. Actually, it has to pay the initial process for research and then it will pay for preservation of the artifacts, so the company will support the whole archaeological research. Actually, this will help to advance the studying of artifacts.
Third, the passage posits that it was difficult to have career in archaeology. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that with new guidelines, there are a lot of paid work in this field and they hire a lot of archaeologists because they need them in preserve the artifacts, in research and in the final processing data. So, there are many jobs and career opportunity in this field, In addition, there are plenty of professionals in Britian nowadays.
The reading claims that the science of archaeology dedicated to uncovering as studying
old
cultural
artifacts
in
Britian
was faced
with serious problems and limitations in Britain and it provides three reasons of support.
However
, the professor states that in 1990
new
rules
and guidelines
are adapted
to
improve
the archaeology field. She refutes each of the author's reasons.
First
, the article avers that
many
valuable
artifacts
were lost
to
construction
projects.
In contrast
, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the
new
guidelines state that when
construction
starts
, the location should
be examined
before
the
construction
. If the area has valuable and
interestiong
artifacts
for archaeologists, they should build a fence and to
make
plane
to search in the location. In fact, they may
make
excavation and documents
before
the
construction
proceed.
Second, the passage asserts that
many
archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological
research
was inadequate.
On the other hand
, the speaker counters this point by stating that with
new
rules
, the archaeological
research
will
be paid
by a
construction
company
. Actually, it
has to
pay the initial process for
research
and then it will pay for preservation of the
artifacts
,
so
the
company
will support the whole archaeological
research
. Actually, this will
help
to advance the studying of artifacts.
Third, the passage posits that it was difficult to have career in archaeology.
Conversely
, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that with
new
guidelines, there are
a lot of
paid work in this
field and
they hire
a lot of
archaeologists
because
they need them in preserve the
artifacts
, in
research
and in the final processing data.
So
, there are
many
jobs and career opportunity in this field,
In addition
, there are
plenty
of professionals in
Britian
nowadays.