Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading claims that buzzing, which is a new tactic that advertising companies have started using it in response of ignoring commercial advertisements, has generated a lot of controversy and many critics would like to see it banned and it provides three reasons of support.

The reading claims that buzzing, which is a new tactic that advertising companies have started using it in response of ignoring commercial advertisements, has generated a lot of controversy and many critics would like to see it banned and it provides three reasons of support. 9LGap
The reading claims that buzzing, which is a new tactic that advertising companies have started using it in response of ignoring commercial advertisements, has generated a lot of controversy and many critics would like to see it banned and it provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer who is a part time job buzzer and he a student also. He talks about the phone service that interests him and he says that the reasons in the passage are misleading and give wrong impression and he refutes each of the author's reasons. First, the article avers that the critics complain that consumers should know whether a person praising a product is being paid to praise the product. In contast, the buzzer mentions that this point seems not true because a company finds one who likes the product and the buzzers are not ordinary advertising employee. In addition, he get paid from the company and he get the truth. This disputes the information made in the passage. Second, the passage posits that since buzzers pretend they are just private individuals, consumers listen to their endorsements less critically than they should. On the other hand, the speaker opposes this point by stating that this is not true. In fact, the opposite is the truth. According to the lecturer, people ask a lot of questions such as the price of the product, and the service, so if the company sont sure that the product is good, it will not let the buzzer answer the questions. Third, the reading asserts that worst off all is the harmful effect that buzzing is likely to have on social relationship because buzzing will result in the spread of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty. Conversely, the lecturer argues that this point is stupid and if the product is bad so the buzzer will not say that it is good. Besides, the buzzer tried the phone and he loves it so the buzzing will lead to good expectation and good trustful.
The reading claims that
buzzing
, which is a new tactic that advertising
companies
have
started
using it in response of ignoring commercial advertisements, has generated
a lot of
controversy and
many
critics would like to
see
it banned and it provides three reasons of support.
However
, the lecturer who is a
part time
job
buzzer and
he a student
also
. He talks about the phone service that interests
him and
he says that the reasons in the passage are misleading and give
wrong
impression and
he refutes each of the author's reasons.

First
, the article avers that the critics complain that consumers should know whether a person praising a
product
is
being paid
to praise the
product
. In
contast
, the buzzer mentions that this point seems not true
because
a
company
finds one who likes the
product
and the buzzers are not ordinary advertising employee.
In addition
, he
get
paid from the
company and
he
get
the truth. This disputes the information made in the passage.

Second, the passage posits that since buzzers pretend they are
just
private individuals, consumers listen to their endorsements less
critically
than they should.
On the other hand
, the speaker opposes this point by stating that this is not true. In fact, the opposite is the truth. According to the lecturer,
people
ask
a lot of
questions such as the price of the
product
, and the service,
so
if the
company
sont
sure that the
product
is
good
, it will not
let
the buzzer answer the questions.

Third, the reading asserts that worst off all is the harmful effect that
buzzing
is likely to have on social relationship
because
buzzing
will result in the spread of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty.
Conversely
, the lecturer argues that this point is stupid and if the
product
is
bad
so
the buzzer will not say that it is
good
.
Besides
, the buzzer tried the
phone and
he
loves
it
so
the
buzzing
will lead to
good
expectation and
good
trustful.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading claims that buzzing, which is a new tactic that advertising companies have started using it in response of ignoring commercial advertisements, has generated a lot of controversy and many critics would like to see it banned and it provides three reasons of support.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
333 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: