Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading claims that many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and it provides three reasons of support.

The reading claims that many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and it provides three reasons of support. doDoP
The reading claims that many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and it provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that ethanol is a good alternative for gasoline and none of the reasons is convincing. He refutes each of the author's reasons. First, the article avers that the increase use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by gasoline use: global warming. In contrast, the speaker opposes this point by saying that ethanol will not increase the global warming. In fact, it is true that ethanol releases carbon dioxide but ethanol often made from plants such as corn and the process for growing corn would absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As a result, growing plants would remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and it would help decrease the global warming. Second, the article posits that the production of significant amounts of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses to feed farm animals. On the other hand, the lecturer counters this point by stating that ethanol production does not have to reduce the resources for other animals. Actually, ethanol could produce from celleluse which is a compenent in the cell wall in plants and it could be produce from plants that are not eaten by animals. He adds that so production of ethanol will not affect on food resources for other animals. Third, the passage asserts that ethanol fuel will never be able compete with gasoline on price. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that ethanol will be able to compete with gasoline on price. He mentions that it is true that government subsidies ethanol production, but when enough people will use ethanol, producers will increase the production of ethanol and this would lead to drop of the ethanol's price. He adds that study shows that ethanol production would increase three times in future and the cost would drop by 40%.
The reading claims that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
critics argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
replacement for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
and it provides three reasons of support.
However
, the professor states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
is a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
alternative for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
and none of the reasons is convincing. He refutes each of the author's reasons.

First
, the article avers that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
fuel would not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to solve one of the biggest environmental problems caused by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
: global warming.
In contrast
, the speaker opposes this point by saying that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
the global warming. In fact, it is true that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
releases carbon dioxide
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
made from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
such as corn and the process for growing corn would absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
As a result
, growing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
would remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and it would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
decrease the global warming.

Second, the article posits that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of significant amounts of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
would
dramatically
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
available for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
to feed farm animals.
On the other hand
, the lecturer counters this point by stating that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
does not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the resources for other animals. Actually,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
could produce from
Possible spelling mistake found.
celleluse
which is a
Possible spelling mistake found.
compenent
in the cell wall in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
and it could be produce from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
plants
that are not eaten by animals. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
will not
Did you mean "effect"?
affect
on food resources for other animals.

Third, the passage asserts that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
fuel will never be
The preposition 'to' is required in front of the verb 'compete'.
able compete
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
on price.
Conversely
, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
will be able to compete with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gasoline
on price. He mentions that it is true that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
subsidies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
when
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
, producers will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
and this would lead to drop of the ethanol's price. He
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
that study
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ethanol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
would
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increase
three times in future and the cost would drop by 40%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading claims that many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and it provides three reasons of support.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
335 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The reading claims that many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline and it provides three reasons of support.