Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The reading claims that because of the large scale of the damage in Yellowstone, many people called for replacing the" let it burn"policy with a policy of distinguishing forests fires as soon as they appeared.

The reading claims that because of the large scale of the damage in Yellowstone, many people called for replacing the" let it burn" policy with a policy of distinguishing forests fires as soon as they appeared. MMwMQ
The reading claims that because of the large scale of the damage in Yellowstone, many people called for replacing the" let it burn" policy with a policy of distinguishing forests fires as soon as they appeared. It provides three kinds of damages caused by the" let it burn" policy. However, the professor states that fires are natural things and they have a creative role for forests and she states three advantages for the Yellowstone's fire. First, the article avers that Yellowstone fire caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. In contrast, the speaker opposes this point by saying that after the fires, the area was conlonized by new plants so the plants became more divers. She mentions that fires created a good habitat for new plants. In addition, the seeds of certain species did not terminate, but they reappeared after the fire. This disputes the first point in the passage. Second, the article posits that the park wildlife was affected as well. On the other hand, the lecturer counters this point by stating that animals' population were thrived after the fire because of the new opportunity there for small animals. In fact, she argues that the fire created an ideal habitat for animlas such as rabbites and many predators appeared there so food chain became so strong. This appears a contradiction to the information made in the passage. Third, the passage asserts that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that this would be a problem if the fire happens every year, but that fire occured because of many combination such as low rain fall, dryness, and winds. She explains that this combination did not occur after this fire and visitores came back next year after the damage and each year after that.
The reading claims that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the large scale of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
damage
in Yellowstone,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
called for replacing
Possible spelling mistake found.
the&quot
;
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
it
Possible spelling mistake found.
burn&quot
; policy with a policy of distinguishing forests
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
soon
as they appeared. It provides three kinds of damages caused by
Possible spelling mistake found.
the&quot
;
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
it
Possible spelling mistake found.
burn&quot
; policy.
However
, the professor states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
are natural
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
things and
they have a creative role for
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
forests and
she states three advantages for the Yellowstone's fire.

First
, the article avers that Yellowstone
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
caused tremendous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
damage
to the park's trees and other vegetation.
In contrast
, the speaker opposes this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
by saying that after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
, the area was
Possible spelling mistake found.
conlonized
by new plants
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
the plants became more divers. She mentions that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
created a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
habitat for new plants.
In addition
, the seeds of certain species did not terminate,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they reappeared after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
. This disputes the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
in the passage.

Second, the article posits that the park wildlife was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
as well
.
On the other hand
, the lecturer counters this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
by stating that animals' population
were thrived
after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the new opportunity there for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
animals. In fact, she argues that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
created an ideal habitat for
Possible spelling mistake found.
animlas
such as
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "rabbit", the plural form of the noun 'rabbit'?
rabbites
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
predators appeared there
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
food chain became
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
strong. This appears a contradiction to the information made in the passage.

Third, the passage asserts that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fires
compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
consequences for the local economy.
Conversely
, the professor casts doubt on this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
point
by explaining that this would be a problem if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
happens every year,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "occurred", the past tense form of the verb 'occur'?
occured
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of
Possible agreement error. The noun combination seems to be countable; consider using: "many combinations".
many combination
such as low rain fall, dryness, and winds. She
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that this combination did not occur after this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fire
and
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "visitors", the plural form of the noun 'visitor'?
visitores
came back
next
year after the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
damage
and each year after that.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The reading claims that because of the large scale of the damage in Yellowstone, many people called for replacing the" let it burn" policy with a policy of distinguishing forests fires as soon as they appeared.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The reading claims that because of the large scale of the damage in Yellowstone, many people called for replacing the" let it burn"policy with a policy of distinguishing forests fires as soon as they appeared.