Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The reading and the lecture are both about finding ways to predict earthquakes.

The reading and the lecture are both about finding ways to predict earthquakes. qVDEp

The reading and the lecture are both about finding ways to predict earthquakes. The author of the reading suggests some methods than can be use to predict earthquakes. The lecturer, however, rebuts the author's ideas. He thinks that the methods propossed in the reading part doe not hold clear evidence and are questionable. To begin with, the author claims that one way to see that an earthquake is coming can be done by observation of animals's behavior. He says that animals act differently when they feel that an earthquake is about to happen. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He states that it is not true that animals change their behavior because of that. Also, he says that a minir trumbeling can not lead to earthquake. Secondly, the reading part holds the idea that headaches occure in people can be another signal that an earthquake is approaching. On the other hand, the lecure oposes this statement. It says that headache is not a realible sign of it. This is a rare symptom and the magnetite is so small, therefor it can not be true. Finally, the writer thinks that by measuring of the emisions of readon earthquake can also be predicted. The speaker opposes this idea, by sayin that this is not a practical way to predict earthquake and the emisions of radon is not a forecast for earthquakes. In conclusion, there seems to be a lot of dissagrements between the passage and the lecture, that are unlikly to be solved.

The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 and the lecture are both about finding ways to predict You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquakes
. The author of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 suggests This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 methods than can be Make sure that 'use to' is correct. For habitual actions in the past or to mean 'accustomed to', use "used to".used to
use to
 predict You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquakes
. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
 lecturer, however
, rebuts the author's This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtsconceptsnotions
ideas
. He This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonsassumesbelievesconsiders
thinks
 that the methods Possible spelling mistake found.proposed
propossed
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 part doe not hold This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 evidence and are questionable.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, the author claims that one way to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 that an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquake
 is coming can be done
 by observation of Did you mean "animal's" or "animals'"?animal'sanimals'
animals's
 behavior. He says that animals act differently
 when they feel that an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquake
 is about to happen. This specific argument is challenged
 by the lecturer. He states that it is not true that animals This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
 their behavior This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of that. Also
, he says that a Possible spelling mistake found.minorminiminerminimminismini r
minir
Possible spelling mistake found.crumblingtumblingrumblingtremblinggrumblingtrumpeting
trumbeling
 can not lead to earthquake.

Secondly
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaccountknowledgelessonstudyversionexamination
reading
 part holds the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 that headaches Possible spelling mistake found.occuroccursoccur e
occure
 in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 can be another signal that an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquake
 is approaching. On the other hand
, the Possible spelling mistake found.securelecture
lecure
Possible spelling mistake found.opposesposesopuseso poses
oposes
 this statement. It says that headache is not a Possible spelling mistake found.realizereliablefeasiblereadablerealizableresalable
realible
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :indication
sign
 of it. This is a rare symptom and the magnetite is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
, therefor it can not be true.

Finally
, the writer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonsassumesbelievesconsiders
thinks
 that by measuring of the Possible spelling mistake found.emissionselisions
emisions
 of Possible spelling mistake found.reasonradonread on
readon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquake
 can also
be predicted
. The speaker opposes this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
, by Possible spelling mistake found.sayingsatinSabinsarinsay in
sayin
 that this is not a practical way to predict You use this word too often, consider replacing it withupheavalshocktemblor
earthquake
 and the Possible spelling mistake found.emissionselisions
emisions
 of radon is not a forecast for earthquakes.

In conclusion
, there seems to be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
Possible spelling mistake found.disagreements
dissagrements
 between the passage and the lecture, that are Possible spelling mistake found.unlikely
unlikly
 to be solved
. 