The reading and lecture both are about the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico were remarkable for their 'great houses', which were massive buildings made of enormous stone. The reading passage presents three theories about how the buildings were used. On the other hand, the lecture casts doubt on claims made by the author and says that those arguments about Chaco Canyon are not convincing.
Firstly, the author contends that the Chaco structures were residential and hundreds of people lived in the house. It is stated in the article that Chaco houses were similar to 'apartment buildings' at Taco, New Mexico, where people had lived for decades. In contrast, the speaker explains that if hundreds of people had lived, there should be a lot of fireplaces. But there were only a few of them. It goes without saying that there were not enough rooms available for hundreds of people. Therefore, it was not considered as a residential.
Secondly, the author argues that Chaco structures were used to store food supplies such as grain maize, which could be stored for years without spoiling. Besides, maize supplies had to be stored somewhere to make them suitable for the purpose. On the other hand, the lecturer states that it sounds plausible to store food supplies but excavation could not have been covered for maize contamination. In other words, there should not have a spilling of maize and containers if it was only for the purpose of maize storage.
Lastly, the author posits that houses were used as ceremonial centers. Furthermore, mound formed were identified by a stack of old material. However, the professor insists that mound contains myriad materials, such as building materials or construction tools which suggest that it could have been from the trash of construction material, which had been thrown away and could be a regular pile as well. Thus, none of the evidence suggests that houses were used as ceremonial centers.
The reading and lecture both are about the settlements of
Chaco
Canyon in New Mexico were remarkable for their 'great
houses
', which were massive buildings made of enormous stone. The reading passage presents three theories about how the buildings were
used
.
On the other hand
, the lecture casts doubt on claims made by the
author
and says that those arguments about
Chaco
Canyon are not convincing.
Firstly
, the
author
contends that the
Chaco
structures were residential and hundreds of
people
lived
in the
house
. It
is stated
in the article that
Chaco
houses
were similar to 'apartment buildings' at Taco, New Mexico, where
people
had
lived
for decades.
In contrast
, the speaker
explains
that if hundreds of
people
had
lived
, there should be
a lot of
fireplaces.
But
there were
only
a few of them. It goes without saying that there were not
enough
rooms available for hundreds of
people
.
Therefore
, it was not considered as
a residential
.
Secondly
, the
author
argues that
Chaco
structures were
used
to store food supplies such as grain maize, which could
be stored
for years without spoiling.
Besides
, maize supplies had to
be stored
somewhere to
make
them suitable for the purpose.
On the other hand
, the lecturer states that it sounds plausible to store food supplies
but
excavation could not have
been covered
for maize contamination.
In other words
, there should not have a spilling of maize and containers if it was
only
for the purpose of maize storage.
Lastly
, the
author
posits that
houses
were
used
as ceremonial centers.
Furthermore
, mound formed
were identified
by a stack of
old
material
.
However
, the professor insists that mound contains myriad
materials
, such as building
materials
or construction tools which suggest that it could have been from the trash of construction
material
, which had
been thrown
away and could be a regular pile
as well
.
Thus
, none of the evidence suggests that
houses
were
used
as ceremonial centers.