Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The professor discusses the portrait and asserts that it is loosely related to the Austen family, since the arguments in the article is not convincing.

The professor discusses the portrait and asserts that it is loosely related to the Austen family, since the arguments in the article is not convincing. xmxjQ
The professor discusses the portrait and asserts that it is loosely related to the Austen family, since the arguments in the article is not convincing. The information he presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage. First, the speaker makes the point that when the portrait was firstly authorized, Jane was deed for 17 years; hence, her family members had never seen her. Thus, how can they recognize her face and endorse the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen. However, the article indicates that the Austen family itself has endorsed the claim that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen. Second, the lecturer posits that Austen family was large enough so that countless teenagers resembling Jane might be existed between them. Therefore, the girl in the portrait and the sketch can be one of the teenagers in the Austen family instead of Jane. Moreover, some sophisticated people cited that the girl is actually one of the teenagers in the Austen family named Mary. On the other hand, the reading passage specifies that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch depicting Jane. Third, the professor states that other evidences are in direct contrast with the evidence of Ozias Humphrey style, which show a different date for the painting of portrait. According to the stamp on the back of the portrait, William Leg sold the portrait in London when Jane was 27 years old; consequently, this evidence refutes the assertion that Jane was a teenager when the portrait was painted. On the contrary, the article concludes that Jane was a teenager when the portrait was painted based only on Ozias Humphrey's style of painting and the time period in which he was an active painter.
The professor discusses the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
and asserts that it is
loosely
related to the Austen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
, since the arguments in the article is not convincing. The information he presents contradicts the facts outlined in the reading passage.

First
, the speaker
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
the point that when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
was
firstly
authorized, Jane
was deed
for 17 years;
hence
, her
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
members had never
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
her.
Thus
, how can they recognize her face and endorse the claim that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girl
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
is Jane Austen.
However
, the article indicates that the Austen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
itself has endorsed the claim that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girl
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
is Jane Austen.

Second, the lecturer posits that Austen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
was large
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that countless
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teenagers
resembling Jane might
be existed
between them.
Therefore
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girl
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
and the sketch can be one of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teenagers
in the Austen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
instead
of Jane.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
sophisticated
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
cited that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
girl
is actually one of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teenagers
in the Austen
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
named Mary.
On the other hand
, the reading passage specifies that the face in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
clearly
resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch depicting Jane.

Third, the professor states that other evidences are in direct contrast with the evidence of
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ozias
Humphrey style, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
date for the painting of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
. According to the stamp on the back of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
, William Leg sold the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
in London when Jane was 27 years
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
;
consequently
, this evidence refutes the assertion that Jane was a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teenager
when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
was painted
.
On the contrary
, the article concludes that Jane was a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teenager
when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
portrait
was painted
based
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
on
Possible spelling mistake found.
Ozias
Humphrey's style of painting and the time period in which he was an active painter.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The professor discusses the portrait and asserts that it is loosely related to the Austen family, since the arguments in the article is not convincing.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
294 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The professor discusses the portrait and asserts that it is loosely related to the Austen family, since the arguments in the article is not convincing.