Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The passage and lecture are arguing over the question wether Greek used a mirror as a weapon for burning the roman ships.

The passage and lecture are arguing over the question wether Greek used a mirror as a weapon for burning the roman ships. 7apk5
The passage and lecture are arguing over the question wether Greek used a mirror as a weapon for burning the roman ships. The passage lists out some reasons that burning mirrors were not a practical and possible weapon. On the contrary, the lecturer chalenges these reasons and she believes that Greek used burning mirors for defending themselves. Firstly, based on the passage, the Greek were not capable to build such a large and precise parabolic curvature from technological point of view. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that the Greeks built some small pieces and assemble these pieces for building such a precis parabolic curvature object. Secondly, the passage author cliams that experiment's results shows that the Reman ships would be unmoving, in this respect, it lasts ten minutes that buning mirror can bur wooden pieces of the ships. However, the lecturer refuses this point and she asserts that the all pieces of the roman ship were not made from wood. In better words, there were some pieces which were called ptich and the pithc was made from flamable and waterproof material. Therefore, Greek were able to burn the roman ship, only with focusing sun ray on pitch for some seconds. Third, the passage states that Greek were able use flaming arrows instead of the burning mirrors. The lecturer, however, rebuts this arguement and she mentions that Roman soldiers were familiar with flamable arrows and they could to defend themselves while they had no idea about the burning mirror. They just saw big mirrors, after that, their ships would be burned. Therefore, they were not defend themselves and they thought it is a migic. As a result, the burning mirrors were more efficient than flamable arrows. All in all, the passage lists three reasons to refuse the presence of the burning mirrors, but the lecturer chalenges these rreasons to prove the existence of the burning mirrors.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
and lecture are arguing over the question
Did you mean "whether"?
wether
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Greek
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
a mirror as a weapon for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roman
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ships
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
lists out
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
reasons that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirrors were not a practical and possible weapon.
On the contrary
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
Possible spelling mistake found.
chalenges
these
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
reasons and
she believes that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Greek
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
Possible spelling mistake found.
mirors
for defending themselves.

Firstly
, based on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Greek
were not capable to build such a large and precise parabolic curvature from technological point of view.
In contrast
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
mentions that the Greeks built
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pieces
and assemble these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pieces
for building such a
'precis' is an imported foreign expression, which originally has a diacritic. Consider using "précis"
precis
parabolic curvature object.

Secondly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
author
Possible spelling mistake found.
cliams
that experiment's results
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
that the
Possible spelling mistake found.
Reman
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ships
would be unmoving, in this respect, it lasts ten minutes that
Possible spelling mistake found.
buning
mirror can bur wooden
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pieces
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ships
.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
refuses this
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
point and
she asserts that the all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pieces
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roman
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ship
were not made from wood. In better words, there were
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pieces
which
were called
Possible spelling mistake found.
ptich
and the
Possible spelling mistake found.
pithc
was made
from
Possible spelling mistake found.
flamable
and waterproof material.
Therefore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Greek
were able to burn the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roman
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ship
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
with focusing sun ray on pitch for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
seconds.

Third, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
states that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Greek
were able
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
flaming arrows
instead
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirrors. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
,
however
, rebuts this
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
arguement and
she mentions that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Roman
soldiers were familiar with
Possible spelling mistake found.
flamable
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
arrows and
they could to defend themselves while they had no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirror. They
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
mirrors, after that, their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ships
would
be burned
.
Therefore
, they were not
Consider using a past participle here: "defended".
defend
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
themselves and
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
it is a
Possible spelling mistake found.
migic
.
As a result
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirrors were more efficient than
Possible spelling mistake found.
flamable
arrows.

All in all, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
passage
lists three reasons to refuse the presence of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirrors,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
Possible spelling mistake found.
chalenges
these
Possible spelling mistake found.
rreasons
to prove the existence of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
burning
mirrors.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The passage and lecture are arguing over the question wether Greek used a mirror as a weapon for burning the roman ships.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
315 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6.5band
    Some people think that schools should switch from print textbooks to digital textbooks on tablets, while others disagree.
    The argument that students' textbooks should be replaced by electronic books on tablets is both supported and refuted by many. In my opinion, even though digital technologies appear as a suitable learning tool for students, there are still indisputable advantages to continue using printed books sinc...
  • 6band
    The passgae and lecture are arguing over why see cows were extiniction.
    The passgae and lecture are arguing over why see cows were extiniction. The reading passage author lists out three possible theories about the main cause of the extinction. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges these theorie one by one. Firstly, the passage notes that the native Siberian people ...
  • 6.5band
    The world’s forests
    The passage and lecture are arguing over whether establishing international funding is practicla way for protecting the forests. The author maintains that this fund is an efficient solution for at leat three reasons. In contrast, the lecturer challenges these reasons one by one and states that, thes...
  • 6band
    The passgae and lecture are arguing over why see cows were extiniction.
    The passgae and lecture are arguing over why see cows were extiniction. The reading passage author lists out three possible theories about the main cause of the extinction. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges these theorie one by one. Firstly, the passage notes that the native Siberian people ...
  • 6.5band
    The passage and lecture are arguing about the function of the carved stone balls.
    The passage and lecture are arguing about the function of the carved stone balls. The author lists out three possible theories to explain this matter. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that all these theories are unconvincing and she challenges proposed theories one by one. First, the passage ...
  • 6.5band
    Studying history courses are integral part of social sciences.
    Studying history courses are integral part of social sciences. However, does studying history is necessary for other fields like engineering, medicine, biology and etc. ? In my opinion, the studying history courses should be mandatory for all fields. Since studying history not only it is interesting...





Get more results for topic:
  • The passage and lecture are arguing over the question wether Greek used a mirror as a weapon for burning the roman ships.