Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company.

The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company. pRbKL
The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company. The reading states that buying and selling fossil collector unfortunate development for both scientist and general public. The lecture refutes this point saying that is not true and the author of the reading exaggerated. First of all, the reading claims that publics have been suffering from buying and selling fossils to private companies. It becomes hard for the publics to see the fossils, which lead to decline in publics’ interest in fossil. The lecture argues that on the other hand, fossils become more available to the community. Furthermore, the professor states that many schools and libraries are now able to buy fossils from the collectors and display them to public. In addition, the reading makes an argument that scientists lose access to some of the most important fossils. For example, wealthy fossil buyers want to obtain the rarest fossils. The lecture counters this point by stating that it is not realistic that scientist do not have access to the most important fossils. According to the professor the only people that can identify and examine the fossils are the scientists. The fossils must pass by the hand of scientists before any one else so scientist would not miss out any important things. Lastly, the reading passage argues that private companies destroy the valuable scientific evidence associated to the fossils they unearth. For example, private companies pay no attention to how fossils lie in the ground or to the smallest fossils surround the bigger one. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing that many will not fossils will not be discovered, if private companies would not do that. Moreover, the professor says that it is better to have many discovered fossils with less scientific information than having less fossils with more scientific information.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
both discuss buying and selling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that buying and selling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
collector unfortunate development for both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientist
and general
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
refutes this point saying
that is
not true and the author of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
exaggerated.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
claims that
Possible spelling mistake found.
publics have
been suffering from buying and selling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
. It becomes
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
for the
Possible spelling mistake found.
publics
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
, which lead to decline in
Possible spelling mistake found.
publics
’ interest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
argues that
on the other hand
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
become more available to the community.
Furthermore
, the professor states that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
schools and libraries are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
able to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
from the collectors and display them to public.

In addition
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
an argument that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
lose access to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
.
For example
, wealthy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
buyers want to obtain the rarest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
counters this point by stating that it is not realistic that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientist
do not have access to the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
. According to the professor the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
that can identify and examine the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
are the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
pass by the hand of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
any one else
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientist
would not miss out any
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
things.

Lastly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage argues that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
the valuable scientific evidence associated to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
they unearth.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
pay no attention to how
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
lie in the ground or to the smallest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
surround the bigger one. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecture
refutes this claim by pointing that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
will not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
will not
be discovered
, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
would not do that.
Moreover
, the professor says that it is better to have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
discovered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
with less scientific information than having
Did you mean "fewer"? The noun fossils is countable.
less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
with more scientific information.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
305 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The lecture and the reading both discuss buying and selling fossil to private company.