The lecturer disputes the suggested author's claims that the clay jars discovered in Iraq were not used as electric batteries in ancient times. She provides several compelling reasons to casts doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the text the jars were not used as batteries since no electric wires were discovered nearby the jars. The lecturer find this idea debatable. she asserts that indeed they might have been used as batteries because those ruins were discovered by ordinary people. He contends that it is possible that because the jars were not discovered by archaeologists, they were overlooked.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the copper in the jars was used to hold the scrolls. She asserts that indeed they might have been used as batteries. Theoretically speaking it is possible that a device at some point might be used to serve one purpose. However, later in time it might serve another purpose. She asserts that this exactly what happened with the cylinders that were discovered.
Finally, the author argues that there are no need for batteries at that time since nothing operates on electricity. However, the lecturer confidently refutes this claim by stating that ancient people used electricity to heal from pain. Moreover, The lecturer contends that people believed at that time of the invisible power, thus, they might have used such devices to alleviate pain.
The
lecturer
disputes the suggested author's claims that the clay
jars
discovered
in Iraq were not
used
as electric batteries in ancient
times
. She provides several compelling reasons to
casts
doubt about the author's claims.
First
, according to the text the
jars
were not
used
as batteries since no electric wires were
discovered
nearby the
jars
. The
lecturer
find this
idea
debatable.
she
asserts that
indeed
they
might
have been
used
as batteries
because
those ruins were
discovered
by ordinary
people
. He contends that it is possible that
because
the
jars
were not
discovered
by archaeologists, they
were overlooked
.
Second, the
lecturer
contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the copper in the
jars
was
used
to hold the scrolls. She asserts that
indeed
they
might
have been
used
as batteries.
Theoretically
speaking it is possible that a device at
some
point
might
be
used
to serve one purpose.
However
, later in
time
it
might
serve another purpose. She asserts that this exactly what happened with the cylinders that
were discovered
.
Finally
, the author argues that there are no need for batteries at that
time
since nothing operates on electricity.
However
, the
lecturer
confidently
refutes this claim by stating that ancient
people
used
electricity to heal from pain.
Moreover
, The
lecturer
contends that
people
believed at that
time
of the invisible power,
thus
, they
might
have
used
such devices to alleviate pain.