This argument offers the demand of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants. The study shows this demand has increased by 30 percent in the past five years. While it is apparent some citizens prefer seafood dishes, the argument suffers from some holes and evidence. The reasons provided by the author requires more information and assumptions.
First the validity and scope of the study for the need in seafood dishes is not as crystal clear. The study is not a representative of all city residents, asking only individuals who go regularly to restaurants. The aspects of this study is not provided to understand how important such growth is. While the interval of five years is considered, the diversity of citizen as the young, and adults, and number of the experiment is not mentioned. Thus, the statistic is not reliable and valid.
Additionally, the author states that the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families who concern eating healthy food outside their homes. This reason does not necessarily apply to all citizens. This survey should provide statistics to demonstrate not only the related majority of families in this study, but also other concerns about food that families have. Maybe, the life style of this group of citizens is just not eating food at home, but they do not care about healthy food at all. Therefore, the survey ought to include more assumptions.
The other weak point of this argument is related to the concept of healthy food. There exist various kinds of foods that are healthy as well; for example, organic food, vegetables, and so on. Also, the way of cooking is really important. Some seafood dishes are cooked with a lot of oil that are not good for our bodies. Hence, for families who do care about healthful eating, seafood is not the only option. Restaurants can provide other options for them.
Finally, at first it is mentioned that there are no operating restaurants whose specialty is seafood. The author expects to see the popularity and profit of the new Captain Seafood restaurant. This expectation is not reasonable, since a few citizen may know about this restaurant. On top of that, the quality and services provided by this restaurant can affect its profits. Therefore, this reason is not enough strong to consider, and some factors should be highlighted.
In overall, examining different angles involved in the consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City, the argument does not show valid assumptions. To strengthen the argument, the author had better conduct a new comprehensive survey which shows the benefits of opening a new seafood restaurant in Bay City.
This
argument
offers the demand of seafood
dishes
in Bay City
restaurants
. The
study
shows
this demand has increased by 30 percent in the past five years. While it is apparent
some
citizens
prefer seafood
dishes
, the
argument
suffers from
some
holes and evidence. The reasons provided by the
author
requires more information and assumptions.
First
the validity and scope of the
study
for the need in seafood
dishes
is not as crystal
clear
. The
study
is not a representative of all city residents, asking
only
individuals who go
regularly
to
restaurants
. The aspects of this
study
is not provided to understand how
important
such growth is. While the interval of five years
is considered
, the diversity of
citizen
as the young, and adults, and number of the experiment is not mentioned.
Thus
, the statistic is not reliable and valid.
Additionally
, the
author
states that the majority of
families
in Bay City are two-income
families
who concern eating
healthy
food
outside their homes. This reason does not
necessarily
apply to all
citizens
. This survey should provide statistics to demonstrate not
only
the related majority of
families
in this
study
,
but
also
other concerns about
food
that
families
have. Maybe, the life style of this group of
citizens
is
just
not eating
food
at home,
but
they do not care about
healthy
food
at all.
Therefore
, the survey ought to include more assumptions.
The other weak point of this
argument
is related
to the concept of
healthy
food
. There exist various kinds of
foods
that are
healthy
as well
;
for example
, organic
food
, vegetables, and
so
on.
Also
, the way of cooking is
really
important
.
Some
seafood
dishes
are cooked
with
a lot of
oil that are not
good
for our bodies.
Hence
, for
families
who do care about healthful eating, seafood is not the
only
option.
Restaurants
can provide other options for them.
Finally
, at
first
it
is mentioned
that there are no operating
restaurants
whose specialty is seafood. The
author
expects
to
see
the popularity and profit of the new Captain Seafood
restaurant
. This expectation is not reasonable, since a few
citizen
may know about this
restaurant
.
On top of that
, the quality and services provided by this
restaurant
can affect its profits.
Therefore
, this reason is not
enough
strong to consider, and
some
factors should
be highlighted
.
In
overall
, examining
different
angles involved in the consumption of seafood
dishes
in Bay City, the
argument
does not
show
valid assumptions. To strengthen the
argument
, the
author
had better conduct a new comprehensive survey which
shows
the benefits of opening a new seafood
restaurant
in Bay City.