Toady, we live in 21st century and technology reaches its peak. Due to advancement in technology, air transportation is introduced. It influence environment very badly and it is major issue for many nations. Some people opine that rise in taxes on air travelling is a good solution for reducing the number of ai passengers. According to me, this method is not much effective. My reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
Most of the passengers travelling by air means are rich or belongs to the high community. The number of individuals from mediocre class are very smaller than the rich class. If the price of tickets increases due to rise in tax, then it will not effect high community but it can be effective in reducing number of travellers from mediocre families. Overall, thee would not be large difference seen. So, this resolution is not beneficial to limit the number of people travelling by air.
Nevertheless, the funds collected by money due to increase in prices of tickets and taxes on air tansport can be used for welfare of folk and improvement of environment. This money should be given to scientists, so that they can research and invent eco-friendly fuels which can be used in airplanes, and air transportation will become safe for environment. Moreover, this money can be used in planting trees specially near the airports as tees can absorb obnoxious gases and also reduce noise pollution.
Before putting my pen down, I concluded that levying moe tax will not influence the growing demand for more flights, but it can be useful in reducing other environment issues like deforestation, air and noise pollution.
Toady, we
live
in 21st century and technology reaches its peak. Due to advancement in technology,
air
transportation
is introduced
. It
influence
environment
very
badly
and it is major issue for
many
nations.
Some
people
opine that rise in
taxes
on
air
travelling is a
good
solution for reducing the
number
of
ai
passengers.
According to me
, this method is not much effective. My reasons will be
explained
in the following paragraphs.
Most of the passengers travelling by
air
means are rich or belongs to the high community. The
number
of individuals from mediocre
class
are
very
smaller than the rich
class
. If the price of tickets increases due to rise in
tax
, then it will not
effect
high community
but
it can be effective in reducing
number
of
travellers
from mediocre families.
Overall
, thee would not be large difference
seen
.
So
, this resolution is not beneficial to limit the
number
of
people
travelling by air.
Nevertheless
, the funds collected by money due to increase in prices of tickets and
taxes
on
air
tansport
can be
used
for welfare of folk and improvement of
environment
. This money should be
given
to scientists,
so
that they can research and invent eco-friendly fuels which can be
used
in airplanes, and
air
transportation will become safe for
environment
.
Moreover
, this money can be
used
in planting trees
specially
near the airports as tees can absorb obnoxious gases and
also
reduce
noise pollution.
Before
putting my pen down, I concluded that levying
moe
tax
will not influence the growing demand for more flights,
but
it can be useful in reducing other
environment
issues like deforestation,
air
and noise pollution.