Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The government should sometimes infringe on people's freedom for the security of society

The government should sometimes infringe on people's freedom for the security of society o67GK

It's a common belief that the idea of intruding upon individual liberties is abhorrent. However, I firmly believe that one's freedom should be violated by the government when the ultimate purpose is to prevent potential dangers and to ensure that safety regulations are being observed. Initially, the infringement of people's liberties can be justified when protecting people from danger is the main priority. Given the recent increase in violence throughout the world, measures must be taken to prevent potential attacks, such as those committed by terrorists. For instance, in order to prevent bombing or the transport of dangerous materials, airports around the world conduct security checks on people and their belongings. Even though this is intrusive and a violation of personal space, it is necessary to protect everyone from harm. Therefore, when this is the intention, government agencies and public institutions should have the right to carry out searches and trespass on one's privacy. In addition, the government can violate an individual's right to freedom in order to make sure that safety regulations are followed. Certain jobs can endanger innocent people's lives when employees do not act safely and responsibly. In this regard, it is important to ensure that these employees follow safety rules even if their rights are infringed upon during the process. Take the example of bus drivers and pilots. If they are not functioning at full capacity, they will not be able to perform their tasks safely. Thus, it's acceptable to make them undergo random medical tests to ensure they are healthy and capable. This is necessary to guarantee that these people are not putting the lives of others in jeopardy. To sum up, intruding on people's freedom is inevitable. If governments are to protect society from threats and make sure that individuals are following the necessary rules. For these reasons, imposing on individual freedom is sometimes necessary

It's a common belief that the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 of intruding upon individual liberties is abhorrent. However
, I firmly
 believe that one's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
 should be violated
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 when the ultimate purpose is to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 potential This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardsrisks
dangers
 and to ensure that safety regulations are being observed
. Initially
, the infringement of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's liberties can be justified
 when protecting This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 from This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
 is the main priority. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
Given
 the recent increase in violence throughout the world, measures This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
be taken
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 potential attacks, such as those committed by terrorists. For instance
, in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 bombing or the transport of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 materials, airports around the world conduct security This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :monitors
checks
 on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 and their belongings. Even though
 this is intrusive and a violation of personal space, it is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunavoidablemandatoryfundamentalurgentindispensablerequired
necessary
 to protect everyone from harm. Therefore
, when this is the intention, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 agencies and public institutions should have the right to carry out searches and trespass on one's privacy. In addition
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 can violate an individual's right to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
 in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 sure that safety regulations are followed
. Certain jobs can endanger innocent This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 when employees do not act safely
 and responsibly
. In this regard, it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 to ensure that these employees follow safety This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
 even if their rights are infringed
 upon during the process. Take the example of bus drivers and pilots. If they are not functioning at full capacity, they will not be able to perform their tasks safely
. Thus
, it's acceptable to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 them undergo random medical This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :evaluates
tests
 to ensure they are healthy and capable. This is You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunavoidablemandatoryfundamentalurgentindispensablerequired
necessary
 to guarantee that these This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are not putting the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 of others in jeopardy. To sum up, intruding on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
 is inevitable. If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 are to protect society from threats and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 sure that individuals are following the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withunavoidablemandatoryfundamentalurgentindispensablerequired
necessary
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
. For these reasons, imposing on individual You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :in some instances
sometimes
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphnecessary.necessary!necessary?necessary:necessary,necessary;
necessary