In this era, it is undeniable fact that spending of capital income of a nation in to protect the environment could be a beneficial in order to mantain sustainability of environment itself. While, it seem that some dilemmas more urgent to be handled or likely more devastate, i strongly believe both local environmental issues or the other problems are vitally equal in term of how to authority to treat them.
Distributing some money to tackle the worsening of urgent environmental issues should be taken by government with regard to reduce the devastation. For salient example, firstly, creating public infrastructure as an increase of convenient transportation systems could reduce of people for using private vehicles and decrese the air pollution from emission. Secondly, goverment also could held conferences, research and international summits in order to generate joint efforts; for instance, Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act to againts global scale issues and it becomes worldwide. However, i believe the other local environmental issues also must be taken.
On the other hand, an amounts of money from devise of nation could become beneficial against local enviromental issues. For example, farmer will be helped if government provide chemical subtances to preventing for pest striking, which lead to suffiecient goods and better quality of crops. Then, local authority also could preserve habitant of endangered species with pay more to monitor protected areas from illegal hunting and logging and therefore biodiversity and ecosystem will stable. Futhermore, goverment could contribute to research which focused on the quality of water and soil, and absolutely will be merits to the people’s health and neccesities.
To sum up, eventhough urgent dilemmas look like more imporant to tackle, the low-scale problem in a country also considerable equal.
In this era, it is undeniable fact that spending of capital income of a nation in to protect the environment could be a beneficial in order to
mantain
sustainability of environment itself. While, it
seem
that
some
dilemmas more urgent to
be handled
or likely more devastate,
i
strongly
believe both
local
environmental
issues
or the other problems are
vitally
equal in term of how to authority to treat them.
Distributing
some
money to tackle the worsening of urgent environmental
issues
should
be taken
by
government
with regard to
reduce
the devastation. For salient example,
firstly
, creating public infrastructure as an increase of convenient transportation systems could
reduce
of
people
for using private vehicles and
decrese
the air pollution from emission.
Secondly
,
goverment
also
could
held
conferences, research and international summits in order to generate joint efforts;
for instance
, Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act to
againts
global scale
issues
and it becomes worldwide.
However
,
i
believe the other
local
environmental
issues
also
must
be taken
.
On the other hand
,
an amounts
of money from devise of nation could become beneficial against
local
enviromental
issues
.
For example
, farmer will be
helped
if
government
provide chemical
subtances
to preventing for pest striking, which lead to
suffiecient
goods
and better quality of crops. Then,
local
authority
also
could preserve habitant of endangered species with pay more to monitor protected areas from illegal hunting and logging and
therefore
biodiversity and ecosystem will stable.
Futhermore
,
goverment
could contribute to research which focused on the quality of water and soil, and
absolutely
will be merits to the
people
’s health and
neccesities
.
To sum up,
eventhough
urgent dilemmas look like more
imporant
to tackle, the low-scale problem in a country
also
considerable equal.