Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree

The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree gmQA
In this era, it is undeniable fact that spending of capital income of a nation in to protect the environment could be a beneficial in order to mantain sustainability of environment itself. While, it seem that some dilemmas more urgent to be handled or likely more devastate, i strongly believe both local environmental issues or the other problems are vitally equal in term of how to authority to treat them. Distributing some money to tackle the worsening of urgent environmental issues should be taken by government with regard to reduce the devastation. For salient example, firstly, creating public infrastructure as an increase of convenient transportation systems could reduce of people for using private vehicles and decrese the air pollution from emission. Secondly, goverment also could held conferences, research and international summits in order to generate joint efforts; for instance, Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act to againts global scale issues and it becomes worldwide. However, i believe the other local environmental issues also must be taken. On the other hand, an amounts of money from devise of nation could become beneficial against local enviromental issues. For example, farmer will be helped if government provide chemical subtances to preventing for pest striking, which lead to suffiecient goods and better quality of crops. Then, local authority also could preserve habitant of endangered species with pay more to monitor protected areas from illegal hunting and logging and therefore biodiversity and ecosystem will stable. Futhermore, goverment could contribute to research which focused on the quality of water and soil, and absolutely will be merits to the people’s health and neccesities. To sum up, eventhough urgent dilemmas look like more imporant to tackle, the low-scale problem in a country also considerable equal.
In this era, it is undeniable fact that spending of capital income of a nation in to protect the environment could be a beneficial in order to
mantain
sustainability of environment itself. While, it
seem
that
some
dilemmas more urgent to
be handled
or likely more devastate,
i
strongly
believe both
local
environmental
issues
or the other problems are
vitally
equal in term of how to authority to treat them.

Distributing
some
money to tackle the worsening of urgent environmental
issues
should
be taken
by
government
with regard to
reduce
the devastation. For salient example,
firstly
, creating public infrastructure as an increase of convenient transportation systems could
reduce
of
people
for using private vehicles and
decrese
the air pollution from emission.
Secondly
,
goverment
also
could
held
conferences, research and international summits in order to generate joint efforts;
for instance
, Protocol Tokyo which an evidence of act to
againts
global scale
issues
and it becomes worldwide.
However
,
i
believe the other
local
environmental
issues
also
must
be taken
.

On the other hand
,
an amounts
of money from devise of nation could become beneficial against
local
enviromental
issues
.
For example
, farmer will be
helped
if
government
provide chemical
subtances
to preventing for pest striking, which lead to
suffiecient
goods
and better quality of crops. Then,
local
authority
also
could preserve habitant of endangered species with pay more to monitor protected areas from illegal hunting and logging and
therefore
biodiversity and ecosystem will stable.
Futhermore
,
goverment
could contribute to research which focused on the quality of water and soil, and
absolutely
will be merits to the
people
’s health and
neccesities
.

To sum up,
eventhough
urgent dilemmas look like more
imporant
to tackle, the low-scale problem in a country
also
considerable equal.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming. To what extent do you agree

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
288 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts