In this recomendation, the director argues that in order to improve the productivity of the employess in Acme Publishing Company, the president should afford them for the Easy Read Course, which was benefit to the company. The aurhor illustrates several edivence to prove the suggestion. Firstly, there were many other companies having their employees to attend this course. Secondly, some of the employees made impressive performance when they finished this course. Thirdly, compared with the benefits that the course brings in, the tuition fee was reasonal for each employee. While the suggestion is problematic in that there are some loopholes in it, more evidence are needed as those in the recommendation are not convicing, we need to evaluate this argument carefully.
To begin with, whether the other companies could be compared with the Acme Publishing Compnay is still in question. As the author does not tell us what kinds of the other companies are, we could not draw the conclusion without this essential reference. In another word, if the other companies were not in the same publishing field, the evidence would not be compelling due to the irrelavance. So more infromation about all of these companies are needed to prove the argument.
Another point is the scale of the students attending to the class is not given, so we could not evaluate the effect of the course. As the author cites two cases of the students while how about all the other students' performance is not told by the author. As we could not evaluate the average performance of the students, the successful cases metioned by the director could be unusual as maybe the other sutdents could not make the same progress like the two graduates metioned in the argument. Moreover, as there are only two successfull cases cited by the director, what made them make so much progress is not given. Maybe they were just very talented while all the others could not be so successfull.
In addtion, the comparing between the benefit to the company and the tuition fee is not convicing. Firstly, we do not know how many kinds of jobs in the Acme Publishing Company thus wheher all of the employees should learn this coures is still in question. As maybe there are some employees who do not need to get so mych information in a short time like the guradians of the company. Secondly, we do not konw the totall number of the staff in this company, even if $500 for each employee is a small, the totall expense could also be very high if there are many employees.
In conclusion, the advice given by the director is not convicing as the reasoning in this arguement is not compelling. To strenthen the author's argument, he/she should make more survey to gather more evidence to prove the effect for all of the employees attending in this course, also, he /she should find more compelling data.
In this
recomendation
, the
director
argues that in order to
improve
the productivity of the
employess
in Acme
Publishing
Company
, the president should afford them for the Easy Read
Course
, which was benefit to the
company
. The
aurhor
illustrates several
edivence
to prove the suggestion.
Firstly
, there were
many
other
companies
having their
employees
to attend this
course
.
Secondly
,
some of the
employees
made impressive performance when they finished this
course
.
Thirdly
, compared with the benefits that the
course
brings in, the tuition fee was
reasonal
for each
employee
. While the suggestion is problematic in that there are
some
loopholes in it, more evidence
are needed
as those in the recommendation are not
convicing
, we need to evaluate this argument
carefully
.
To
begin
with, whether the
other
companies
could
be compared
with the Acme
Publishing
Compnay
is
still
in question. As the author does not
tell
us what kinds of the
other
companies
are, we could not draw the conclusion without this essential reference. In another word, if the
other
companies
were not in the same
publishing
field, the evidence would not be compelling due to the
irrelavance
.
So
more
infromation
about all of these
companies
are needed
to prove the argument.
Another point is the scale of the students attending to the
class
is not
given
,
so
we could not evaluate the effect of the
course
. As the author cites two cases of the students while how about all the
other
students' performance is not
told
by the author. As we could not evaluate the average performance of the students, the successful cases
metioned
by the
director
could be unusual as maybe the
other
sutdents
could not
make
the same progress
like
the two graduates
metioned
in the argument.
Moreover
, as there are
only
two
successfull
cases cited by the
director
, what made them
make
so
much progress is not
given
. Maybe they were
just
very
talented while all the others could not be
so
successfull
.
In
addtion
, the comparing between the benefit to the
company
and the tuition fee is not
convicing
.
Firstly
, we do not know how
many
kinds of jobs in the Acme
Publishing
Company
thus
wheher
all of the
employees
should learn this
coures
is
still
in question. As maybe there are
some
employees
who do not need to
get
so
mych
information in a short time like the
guradians
of the
company
.
Secondly
, we do not
konw
the
totall
number of the staff in this
company
, even if $500 for each
employee
is a
small
, the
totall
expense could
also
be
very
high if there are
many
employees.
In conclusion
, the advice
given
by the
director
is not
convicing
as the reasoning in this
arguement
is not compelling. To
strenthen
the author's argument, he/she should
make
more survey to gather more evidence to prove the effect for
all of the
employees
attending in this
course
,
also
, he /she should find more compelling data.