Mayor argue that building subway system, which will reduce traffice congestion, will ultimetely improve the economy of Briggsville. Howver, he failed to provide essential iformation on unstated assumption.
The first thing he assumed that is most of worker are working inside major downtown areas from which the subway will pass. But what if Briggsville is industrial town and worker daily commute to area different from downtown. So, building the subway system will not improve work effecienty at all.
Even if suppose mojority people are working in downtown, preference of Biggsville people also needs to consider. For instance, in case people prefer car instead of the subway becuase subway can not provide remote trasportation. Also inconsistency and lack of safety of bus service may hinder people from taking bus after arriving to subway station. In this situation traffic congestion is unlikely to do down.
Also, mayor did not stated population of worker and monetary value of improvement in workers' efficiency. The subway sytem is a multi-million-dollor project and finacial feasibility must be checked before arriving any conclusion of improvement in economy. Consider, only slight increase in productivity which is well below the project cost of the subway system can lead to downturn in Briggsville economy. And he were not sure about relation between productivity and time spend in traffic. People may spend time with their family instead of working.
In conclusion, Mayor Harrison assumed relationhsip between the subway system, Briggsville economy improvement and workers' productivity withous stating any clarification on Briggsville people preference, finacial feasibility and working location of people.
Mayor
argue
that building
subway
system
, which will
reduce
traffice
congestion, will
ultimetely
improve
the
economy
of
Briggsville
.
Howver
, he failed to provide essential
iformation
on unstated assumption.
The
first
thing he assumed
that is
most of worker
are working inside major downtown areas from which the
subway
will pass.
But
what if
Briggsville
is industrial town and worker daily commute to area
different
from downtown.
So
, building the
subway
system
will not
improve
work
effecienty
at all.
Even if suppose
mojority
people
are working in downtown, preference of
Biggsville
people
also
needs to consider.
For instance
, in case
people
prefer car
instead
of the
subway
becuase
subway
can not provide remote
trasportation
.
Also
inconsistency and lack of safety of bus service may hinder
people
from taking bus after arriving to
subway
station. In this situation traffic congestion is unlikely to do down.
Also
, mayor did not
stated
population of worker and monetary value of improvement in workers' efficiency. The
subway
sytem
is a
multi-million-dollor
project and
finacial
feasibility
must
be
checked
before
arriving any conclusion of improvement in
economy
. Consider,
only
slight increase in productivity which is well below the project cost of the
subway
system
can lead to downturn in
Briggsville
economy
. And he were not sure about relation between productivity and time spend in traffic.
People
may spend time with their family
instead
of working.
In conclusion
, Mayor Harrison assumed
relationhsip
between the
subway
system
,
Briggsville
economy
improvement and workers' productivity
withous
stating any clarification on
Briggsville
people
preference,
finacial
feasibility and working location of
people
.