The issue of whether people should prefer private or public healthcare has been grown in importance over the past few decades. While there are persuasive arguments in favour of private healthcare, I would argue that it is better to access public healthcare.
On the one hand, some people justifiably argue that there are advantages to state health systems. From their point of view, since state healthcare is paid for by the government using money from taxes, good healthcare should be available to everyone for free. It is also maintained that private healthcare is unfair because only wealthy people can afford it. However, in the public health systems, everyone has access to the same quality of care and treatment. Take, for example, the National Health Service in the UK provides free healthcare for residents.
On the other hand, there are those who subscribe to the view that private healthcare has several benefits. They insist that despite public hospitals that are often very large and difficult to run, private hospitals have shorter waiting lists for operations and appointments, with patients benefiting from faster treatment. Moreover, most people prefer to pay for more personal service, say, having their own room and far more comfortable facilities. However, I do not find this argument convincing, as using private medical centres increase the gap between poor and wealthy individuals.
In my personal opinion, although private health centres might have some advantages, the merits of public healthcare are more prominent. By utilising it, the costs could be lowered, and everyone benefits from treatments.
The issue of whether
people
should prefer
private
or
public
healthcare has
been grown
in importance over the past few decades. While there are persuasive arguments in
favour
of
private
healthcare, I would argue that it is better to access
public
healthcare.
On the one hand,
some
people
justifiably
argue that there are advantages to state
health
systems. From their point of view, since state healthcare
is paid
for by the
government
using money from taxes,
good
healthcare should be available to everyone for free. It is
also
maintained that
private
healthcare is unfair
because
only
wealthy
people
can afford it.
However
, in the
public
health
systems, everyone has access to the same quality of care and treatment. Take,
for example
, the National
Health
Service in the UK provides free healthcare for residents.
On the other hand
, there are those who subscribe to the view that
private
healthcare has several benefits. They insist that despite
public
hospitals that are
often
very
large and difficult to run,
private
hospitals have shorter waiting lists for operations and appointments, with patients benefiting from faster treatment.
Moreover
, most
people
prefer to pay for more personal service, say, having their
own
room and far more comfortable facilities.
However
, I do not find this argument convincing, as using
private
medical
centres
increase the gap between poor and wealthy individuals.
In my personal opinion, although
private
health
centres
might have
some
advantages, the merits of
public
healthcare are more prominent. By
utilising
it, the costs could
be lowered
, and everyone benefits from treatments.