In the reading passage, it is assumed that assigning works to a team or a group of people will bring out a better result contrary to an individual. The lecturer stated some points that contradict the reading passage.
Firstly, he started with recognition of the whole team. Indeed, some existing members do not participate in the contribution of the project. However, when the team gets a successful result, all team members will nevertheless get recognition. This point contradicts the reading passage that assumed a team member could “shine” and stand out from the group when contributing an excellent opinion to the job.
Furthermore, what happens when the whole team made mistakes that cause a significant problem then? He said that no specific team member would be nominated out to be responsible for the issue. Even there were warning signs about the wrong direction from one or a couple of members in a team. The rest of the team typically ignored it. Therefore, the ultimate awful consequence is hard to avoid.
Finally, the reading passage stated that a group of people always help the project progress to move quicker. The lecturer said this view is not accurate. Frequently, the gain will be slower because they need to confirm and get agreements from the other members throughout numerous meetings.
In the
reading
passage, it
is assumed
that assigning works to a
team
or a group of
people
will bring out a better result contrary to an individual. The lecturer stated
some
points that contradict the
reading
passage.
Firstly
, he
started
with recognition of the whole
team
.
Indeed
,
some
existing
members
do not participate in the contribution of the project.
However
, when the
team
gets
a successful result, all
team
members
will
nevertheless
get
recognition. This point contradicts the
reading
passage that assumed a
team
member
could “shine” and stand out from the group when contributing an excellent opinion to the job.
Furthermore
, what happens when the whole
team
made mistakes that cause a significant problem then? He said that no specific
team
member
would
be nominated
out to be responsible for the issue. Even there were warning signs about the
wrong
direction from one or a couple of
members
in a
team
. The rest of the
team
typically
ignored
it.
Therefore
, the ultimate awful consequence is
hard
to avoid.
Finally
, the
reading
passage stated that a group of
people
always
help
the project progress to
move
quicker. The lecturer said this view is not accurate.
Frequently
, the gain will be slower
because
they need to confirm and
get
agreements from the other
members
throughout numerous meetings.