Some people argue that subdivided units are inhumane because the tenants do not have
enough space and are forced to live in very bad conditions. While they do have a point in
their arguments, I think that the lives of such tenants would become even more miserable if
not for the subdivided units, that is, a small roof over their heads is still way better than living
on the streets.
First of all, let's not forget that the subdivided units are alredy the best option for their
tenants. They would move to better places or rent a whole apartment if they had the resources.
So banning subdivided units actually means taking away the best choice from the poorest
people. And that's why the government dare not make subdivided units illegal despite their
notoriety.
Also, most subdivided units are located in downtown areas and thus very convenient for the
tenants to find jobs. There are actually people who prefer to live in downtown and don't mind
sacrificing their living space as a trade-off. Because land is an extremely scarce resource in
downtown, sharing an apartment with strangers is a natural and logical consequence. This
kind of demand for subdivided units will not disappear even if the government develop a lot of
public housing in the New Territories. Location is of essence here.
And because the laws in Hong Kong do not offer enough protection against deadbeat tenants,
subdividing a rental property is a valid solution to lower the risk and stabilize the income, that
is, even if one or two deadbeat tenants default on their rents, others will still keep paying. So
unless our laws can be somehow modified accordingly, subdivided units do have a function.
That said, while it is not wrong to subdivide apartments, letting tenants live in unhygienic or
unsafe environment is certainly immoral, if not illegal. Landlords have the responsibility to
maintain the basic facilities and provide reasonable space to their tenants. They also need to
eliminate fire hazards and ensure that their rental properties have enough protection against
theft.
Subdivided units should not have such a bad reputation if the landlords are willing to provide
quality services worth the rent they are charging. So denouncing subdivided units is missing
the point. We should instead focus on how to regulate them and transform them into a normal
housing choice for the poor or those who put convenience on the top of their priority list.
Some
people
argue that subdivided
units
are inhumane
because
the
tenants
do not have
enough
space and
are forced
to
live
in
very
bad
conditions. While they do have a point in
their arguments, I
think
that the
lives
of such
tenants
would become even more miserable if
not for the subdivided
units
,
that is
, a
small
roof over their heads is
still
way better than living
on the streets.
First of all
,
let
's not forget that the subdivided
units
are
alredy
the best option for their
tenants. They would
move
to better places or rent a whole apartment if they had the resources.
So
banning subdivided
units
actually means taking away the best choice from the poorest
people
. And that's why the
government
dare not
make
subdivided
units
illegal despite their
notoriety.
Also
, most subdivided
units
are located
in downtown areas and
thus
very
convenient for the
tenants to find jobs. There are actually
people
who prefer to
live
in downtown and don't mind
sacrificing their living space as a trade-off.
Because
land is an
extremely
scarce resource in
downtown, sharing an apartment with strangers is a natural and logical consequence. This
kind of demand for subdivided
units
will not disappear even if the
government
develop
a lot of
public housing in the New Territories. Location is of essence here.
And
because
the laws in Hong Kong do not offer
enough
protection against deadbeat tenants,
subdividing a rental property is a valid solution to lower the
risk
and stabilize the income, that
is, even if one or two deadbeat
tenants
default on their rents, others will
still
keep
paying.
So
unless our laws can be somehow modified
accordingly
, subdivided
units
do have a function.
That said, while it is not
wrong
to subdivide apartments, letting
tenants
live
in unhygienic or
unsafe environment is
certainly
immoral, if not illegal. Landlords have the responsibility to
maintain the basic facilities and provide reasonable space to their
tenants
. They
also
need to
eliminate fire hazards and ensure that their rental properties have
enough
protection against
theft.
Subdivided
units
should not have such a
bad
reputation if the landlords are willing to provide
quality services worth the rent they are charging.
So
denouncing subdivided
units
is missing
the point. We should
instead
focus on how to regulate them and transform them into a normal
housing choice for the poor or those who put convenience on the top of their priority list.