In an overview, in this speech and reading discussed about study in same-age peer groups and how organized them. moreover, discussed about drawbacks and benefits aspect Of the dividing children between two group equally. Deliberately, the essential indications in the lecture cast doubt on the fundamental points in the reading.
First of all, the lecture states that the first thing the researcher noticed was that when the boys were divided randomly separated into two group, there was an increases negative attitudes between them or ever competition between them inversely badly. For example they started tease or belittle each other. However, this is contrasts the topic in reading that the asserts that the peer groups build tolerance and decrease conflict because children are equal in terms of status and power.
Furthermore, about to delve conflict and cooperative, the lecture declares that in the when student put back together, the conflict will reduce and cooperation in the tasks increases. Although, this is opposite with clues of the reading that clearly indicates when students are in divided groups, the contests and competition between same age peer groups will reduce.
Finally, the lecture concluded that when children at the same age are divided into group, competition comes from naturally than cooperation. While, this challenges the content in the text that believes cooperation comes naturally to children of the same age.
In an overview, in this speech and reading
discussed about study
in same-age peer
groups
and how organized them.
moreover
,
discussed about drawbacks
and benefits aspect Of the dividing
children
between two
group
equally
.
Deliberately
, the essential indications in the
lecture
cast doubt on the fundamental points in the reading.
First of all
, the
lecture
states that the
first
thing the researcher noticed was that when the boys
were divided
randomly
separated into two
group
,
there was an increases
negative
attitudes between them or ever competition between them
inversely
badly
. For
example they
started
tease or belittle each other.
However
, this is contrasts the topic in reading that the asserts that the peer
groups
build tolerance and decrease conflict
because
children
are equal in terms of status and power.
Furthermore
, about to delve conflict and cooperative, the
lecture
declares that in the when student put back together, the conflict will
reduce
and cooperation in the tasks increases. Although, this is opposite with clues of the reading that
clearly
indicates when students are in divided
groups
, the contests and competition between same age peer
groups
will
reduce
.
Finally
, the
lecture
concluded that when
children
at the same age
are divided
into
group
, competition
comes
from
naturally
than cooperation.
While
, this challenges the content in the text that believes cooperation
comes
naturally
to
children
of the same age.